![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
![]()
9502 on magazines.
9 vs 9, 5 vs 5, 0 vs 0, and 2 vs 2. Please compare the fonts. They were not stamped together. The font on right magazine is a little bit "beefer". The stamp on right magazine also looks "healthier". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 43
Thanks: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I am new to this stuff so I am learning from you guys. Machined parts and hand fitted parts could have slight variations amoung markings, couldn't they? I'm learning while you all hash things out. I thank all of you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]()
I have to agree with Ron Smith on this one.
The "4's" on G S/42's toggles are usually closed topped ( the tips touch) This gun is interesting but is most likely a parts gun, if you look at the take down lever you will see that the first two digits are small font this would be correct for this gun but the "2" is larger and was added at a different time. There is no way of knowing when this was done however. The gun could be period but how do you prove it? Vern |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|