The "Asterisk" Again

Final say,

I have produced scientifically based evidence that the "*" is not and cannot be used as a hardness probe tip.

I ask for your proof that I am wrong and you have responded with a tirade of repetitions of what others have told you.

My statements are based on my own personal observations and hard fact that you have in no way shown to be without basis.

Rather than show what proof you have you have as in the past returned to personal character assination. Calling me a "con man seems" to be beneath even your character.

However there is no explaning what happens when a man without proof is backed into a corner.

The final statement that the "*" was used as a hardness probe is not only rediculous its downright funny that any man can claim to be reasonable and still not recognise the absolute fact when shown hard evidence.

You are right about one thing, You've got an "asterisk"

and you lost it in this case because you will not listen to factual evidence, but insist on claiming that your guess is fact in the face of proof that such is not, and cannot be true.

You are the WEAKEST LINK ! good by.

ViggoG