Early eagle ( Sad Sad Sad)

[RichSr]

I would be interested in hearing how a barrel made for a .308 projectile could handle a .355 bullet. How one could have "shot a few rounds OK, no visible damage to the gun" escapes me. I realize the C96 would chamber the shorter round, but where did the bullets go? Surely not driven through 4+ inches of undersized barrel.

[cma22inc]

Yeah you should box that up and send it to me right away for proper disposal

J/k Looks like a canidate for restoration.

[alvin]

Originally Posted by RichSr

I would be interested in hearing how a barrel made for a .308 projectile could handle a .355 bullet. How one could have "shot a few rounds OK, no visible damage to the gun" escapes me. I realize the C96 would chamber the shorter round, but where did the bullets go? Surely not driven through 4+ inches of undersized barrel.

From the description, the bullets flied out of the 140m/m barrel. Actually, this is the type of shooting that I support -- figure out some myth from shooting. But that could cost too much for individual to perform and I could not afford the price.

9x19 fitting into chamber of 7,63 is no problem. It's not shorter from headspace point of view.