1900 Long Barrel Prototype Luger

Imperial Arms · 11-10-2008, 09:12 AM

In my opinion, there is no 'flaw' with the magazine and nobody has 'messed' with it. What would be the reason to change a button to a flat-type? It is possible that DWM was using up old parts and combining them with newer parts. The retaining pin at the bottom of the magazine is perfect and untouched, so I believe that the integrity of the magazine is correct even though the flat button was theorically intended for an early unrelieved frame.

Albert

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

11-10-2008, 09:12 AM	#20
Imperial Arms Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Malta, EU Posts: 579 Thanks: 0 Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts	In my opinion, there is no 'flaw' with the magazine and nobody has 'messed' with it. What would be the reason to change a button to a flat-type? It is possible that DWM was using up old parts and combining them with newer parts. The retaining pin at the bottom of the magazine is perfect and untouched, so I believe that the integrity of the magazine is correct even though the flat button was theorically intended for an early unrelieved frame. Albert