LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Off Topic & Other Firearms

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 10-10-2008, 10:02 AM   #6
alvin
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
Default

I heard a few theories regarding why NS hammer was introduced. Two typical ones.... one from Mr. Schroeder (Gun Report) saying it helps preventing pushing the safety level up "on" when that's not the intention; one from Mr. 'nemo' (1896mauser.com) saying non-NS safety *might* discharge the gun when it's applied on, and NS safety solved that problem.

I am a little bit on nemo's side. The reason is simple.... pushing back hammer to apply safety on feature was cancelled on Modell 1930. Why did not Mauser worry about non-intentional safety-on action anymore? Actually, safety level on 1930 is relatively 'loose', and it does have that issue, especially when shooting by left hand.

Prussian Eagle was supposed to be on *some* late 1918 guns. A few that I have seen having Eagles, s/n are above 100,000. There were also a few earlier samples having Eagle under the trigger guard. More observation needed. Long long way to go.

What's the s/n of your gun?
alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com