The Ethics of Gun Sales

Tomathvl · 09-29-2008, 04:02 PM

Michael,
Allow me to clarify a point, you state "As I stated at the outset, when I asked David Carroll to make good on his description of the revolver as 100% mechanically sound, he informed me that according to his lawyer he had no duty to disclose the damage at issue."
What is the "damage of issue"you, David Carrol and the lawyer are referring to? Is it the damage to the bluing or is he admitting that the gun was mechanically damaged and repaired and he had no obligation to tell you it was repaired? I'm just trying to understand why you keep coming back with different examples.
Tom

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

09-29-2008, 04:02 PM	#24
Tomathvl User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Milan, IN Posts: 363 Thanks: 3 Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts	Michael, Allow me to clarify a point, you state "As I stated at the outset, when I asked David Carroll to make good on his description of the revolver as 100% mechanically sound, he informed me that according to his lawyer he had no duty to disclose the damage at issue." What is the "damage of issue"you, David Carrol and the lawyer are referring to? Is it the damage to the bluing or is he admitting that the gun was mechanically damaged and repaired and he had no obligation to tell you it was repaired? I'm just trying to understand why you keep coming back with different examples. Tom