LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Commercial Lugers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-23-2008, 04:23 AM   #1
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

Barry,

Knowing the source of information can be crucial in answering a question. Aarron Davis's book is so full of errors and misinformation that any given referral to it must be seriously questioned.

These guns are so seldom seen as to be considerred quite rare, and it would be fair to say that most people have not had an opportunity to examine one, as I have not.

Kenyon's illustrations are not adequate to verify some of his description, particularly the rear frame characteristics which help identify the year of frame production, and how the commercial proof mark matches the chamber date.

Under the circumstances, a gun like this could be faked will enough to fool most aficianados. That is not to say that the gun you are considering is a fake. If photos become available, or if you buy it and can take them, it will be very instructive to us all to see details, particularly those areas which Kenyon points out in his book.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com