LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 04-13-2008, 05:50 AM   #6
alvin
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Regarding the Krieghoff, all references that I've read say "the old tooling was most likely used as a pattern in preparing the new tooling" (e.g. Gibson, 1988), without further description on how it was accomplished.

It sounds like a reverse engineering process -- use existing worn toolset, measure it's dimention and hardness, setup detailed manufactuering procedure, and make a new toolset. Not unlike how Inglis making HP35 in Canada.

Krieghoff must have the original toolset drawings, and schedule of details. It's hard to believe they did not have those papers. It would be easier to follow those papers than reverse engineering. Why they had to use old tooling (physical? that's my understanding) to guide making new tooling? Or, only physical tools were transferred to them without drawing?

=====

A wild guess.... Could the toolset be hierachical.... use Master tools to make Working tools, and use Working tools to make guns ?? Master tools could last long long time because they are seldomly used. Worn Working tools can be replaced as needed.
alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com