LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-14-2008, 11:47 PM   #30
Imperial Arms
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Malta, EU
Posts: 579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ron Wood
The presentation Luger posted by Anna is a fine example of a momento made for or given to someone. Of course it has been refinished, how else could there be blue in the engraving? The statement "In regards to German engraving from the early Imperial era, it was very classical and elegant. All the correct presentation Lugers (and Mausers) which I have examined had very fine quality engraving done at the factory and not the deep/chiselled cuts as shown on your pistol" has no relevance since this obviously is not a factory presentation piece. It is a custom work by an individual or company such as in the ad posted by Gerben for a private party. The engraving does not have the finesse of a master engraver, but it is quite passable. The scrolls and curves are not smoothly executed and the cross hatching is less than masterful. However, the depth of some the cuts suggest that they were cut with a graver and hammer. Usually that results in a "stepped" appearance that is easily visible under magnification. It is barely evident, if at all, in this engraving because who ever executed it took the time to chase the cuts with a burin to smooth them out. That is a step that even some of the masters didn't do.

The near pristine condition of the Luger does not necessarily mean that it was created in the recent past. It is a presentation piece and has spent the majority of its life in a case, protected from the effects of oxidation and the dimming of its finish by UV exposure.

I understand the desire to educate the novice collector about the pitfalls that pollute our hobby. But I do get a bit weary of the constant barrage of analysis that is stated in quite specific terms as if it was a dead certainty. Unless you have the gun in hand, criticism should be constructive and limited, not drawn out at extreme length and to a microscopic level. I keep reminding folks that you can't make a final analysis from photos.

With apologies, I will now get off of my soapbox.
I agree with Ron's opinion that this presentation Luger has been refinished, but an in hand examination by an expert would be required to determine the originality of the refinish. The engraving on the chamber is definitely a custom job and not engraved at the DWM factory by a master engraver, therefore, this Luger is not a factory engraved Luger as believed by Anna.

It is satisfying to observe that this discussion was constructive and conducted in a proper manner. As Ron indicated, analysis should not be pushed to extremes using microscopic precision, although good macro images can be helpful to reveal some features and characteristics on the surface.

Albert
Imperial Arms is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com