LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All Post-WWII Lugers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-01-2008, 01:52 PM   #1
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,991 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

Hi,

I agree that the 'jig' problem needs some further investigation. I'm still waiting for some photographic documentation of the stuff the Swiss sent to Mauser. As far as I'm aware, Mauser just got the jigs, not complete machines, as Parabellum production, like most guns, was mainly done on relatively straightforward machinery.

Mauser would have worked according to the german DIN norm, of which the foundations were laid by it's original parent company, Ludwig Loewe & Cie. in the early 1900s. The Swiss used their own SNV norm.

The choice to go with the Swiss design was not that strange, considering the high production costs of a Parabellum. Mauser sought to drastically cut the number of machining steps from the over 750 steps needed originally. The Swiss already had optimized production with their 06/29 design, after all, so that would make a good starting point.

Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com