![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#7 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Steiner,
I think I will hang on to the 42 dated holster for now. In a way, it could be correct for the gun in that during the war, the original holster for the 1916 could have needed replacement and the 42 was what was issued - repairs and all. Best regards, Mike |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|