LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-02-2006, 04:31 PM   #4
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,121
Thanked 5,287 Times in 1,728 Posts
Default

Curious. The ad says "the presence of some light pitting on the frame above the thumb safety lever indicates the pistol has been arsenal refurbished as writer has seen this on other U.S. Test Lugers". What arsenal? I am unaware of any US arsenal, Rock Island or Springfield, refurbishment of Test Lugers and I am sure they weren't sent back to DWM for refurb. Possibly Waffenfabrik USA arsenal? Anyway, the "13" on the left side of the TD and the evidence of refinish over pitting makes this "mint" example suspicious.

I was also very interested in the document in the case that indicates "Report No, 9242 on Luger No. 6413 1 of 5 issued to Capt. White, 11 Cavalry Fort Ethan Allen, Vt. Nov 7, 1901". I wonder where that information came from? I have always been under the impression that the only Lugers that were identified by serial number as being issued to a specific unit were the 5 reported by 2nd Lt. Orlando G. Palmer, 7th Cavalry, Cuba in his test report.

Nice holster though.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com