1914 Erfurt dilemma--SOLVED!

drbuster · 08-24-2002, 10:36 AM

Reply to Brandon and Garfield, First I guess the "value" of my Erfurt would have to have been diminished by the revelation that it may have been assembled from parts left over. The "original" ns,a and b suffixes with unrelieved sear bars, un-notched chanbers and double proofed clips were "true" 1914's. But if Garfield is correct, why is the chamber stamped "1914"? In light of all this thread and previous ones on this matter, what is your theory?

08-24-2002, 10:36 AM	#21
drbuster User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: San Mateo, California Posts: 1,432 Thanks: 2 Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts	Reply to Brandon and Garfield, First I guess the "value" of my Erfurt would have to have been diminished by the revelation that it may have been assembled from parts left over. The "original" ns,a and b suffixes with unrelieved sear bars, un-notched chanbers and double proofed clips were "true" 1914's. But if Garfield is correct, why is the chamber stamped "1914"? In light of all this thread and previous ones on this matter, what is your theory?