The Cartridge Counter, Awesome

[cirelaw]

This thread is like a luger court of law. Each witness comes to court/forum along with their respective opinion. Some jurors agree and others don't! They are instructed that they may accept, reject of mearly dismiss the opinions offered. In the end the jury must make their decision by the greater weight of the facts presented. As in human nature there is always different opinions as to the facts and evidence admitted. The standard is the greater weight of evidence. Opinions may be admitted only through 'expert witnesses' who then are examined based on the facts presented. Jurors can either agree with the whitness, disagree or reject outright! Here we are presented with Chuck Whittakers opinions. Some of us juriors will agree and others may disagree with the opinions tendered. Here in luger court much is the same! Whittaker has presented his opinion and conclusions based upon those facts as he perceives them! The witness veracity, first hand knowlege, monetary gain or hidden motives are examined. After years in a court room I've been taught sometimes in a hard way not to jump to conclusions until all the credible evidence is heard. The Latins have a saying, 'Res Ipsa Loquitor' ~The facts speak for themselves~ The luger story is rewritten amended and corrected almost daily and a part of our lives. This due especially to computer on-line research. This is the reason its so special
and fun! Each of us jurors share in its' history albeit changing and evolving and thats why we are so proud and sometimes corrected! Yes we all count~ Respecially Submitted~~~ Eric, Esq