LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Holster Forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 09-08-2002, 03:14 PM   #8
Garfield
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A little SE of Nome
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Point of claification: As I understand it, a numbered waffenampt stamp was assigned to a particular officer, who may have had other personel assisting him. It was the responsibility that officer to inspect and approve a particular item for acceptance by the military. If the item was up to spec it was stamped with the waffenampt. In the case of holsters, an inspector might be assigned to inspect several holster manufacturers whose factories were located in a designated area. All holsters inspected by that officer would bear the same waffenamt #. If the officer was tranfered to a different area, his stamp went with him.

Manufacturers, on the other hand, were assigned lettered codes, e.g., bml.

Plumb forgot about this data being included in Constanzo. Interesting to note the conflicting opinions held by Walther and Constanzo regarding the type of business conducted by Schnellpressenfabrik AG. Tom A, are any of your Wa 107 stamped holsters stamped with the maker's letter code? As indicated in Constanzo, officer 107, in addition to K.W.K and Auwaerter was also responsible for inspecting Hans Romer.
Garfield is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com