!!! LUGER on TV today !!!

alvin · 02-12-2010, 04:46 AM

So, you mean it's harder, because the parts are smaller? But the statement "nothing saved" is still legitimate in that case, although it's a under statement.

====

[Edit] The article did mention "many parts were rejected, scraped and remade because their aspect, dimentions and/or tolerance were not perfect". Making a single gun amplified this problem. I would think that's the core difficulty, not the size (1/2, 2/5 of a Navy model is small but not tiny).

Or, I missed something?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

02-12-2010, 04:46 AM	#10
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	So, you mean it's harder, because the parts are smaller? But the statement "nothing saved" is still legitimate in that case, although it's a under statement. ==== [Edit] The article did mention "many parts were rejected, scraped and remade because their aspect, dimentions and/or tolerance were not perfect". Making a single gun amplified this problem. I would think that's the core difficulty, not the size (1/2, 2/5 of a Navy model is small but not tiny). Or, I missed something?