LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Artillery Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-24-2020, 12:34 PM   #1
Mikeinmi
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default First luger and first post

My charming wife bought me this as a gift I took it apart for inspection and cleaning. It is all matching except the left grip panel. But why would someone in the past scrub the area at the date? Also I noted "bubba" ground off the stock attachment. I will not tell my wife she probably got ripped off. She has bought me some very nice guns in the past.
https://imgur.com/a/Hf7zspT
more images
https://imgur.com/a/ySGhVO8

Last edited by Mikeinmi; 11-01-2020 at 04:23 PM.
Mikeinmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-24-2020, 12:59 PM   #2
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

Welcome to this LUGER forum from Italy.

From a single and partial photograph we cannot say much, however unfortunately we do not know who has owned the weapons we have now, nor how many have been their owners, so it's fairly normal that a nice gun might have been "used and abused" by one of them in the past.
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-24-2020, 09:53 PM   #3
spripple33
User
 
spripple33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 85
Thanks: 137
Thanked 167 Times in 54 Posts
Default

Welcome to the forum.
I wish MY wife bought me gifts like this! I agree with Sergio that it is difficult to give much opinion on your Luger without more photos. Closeup pictures of all the exterior markings other than serial numbers on small parts would be very helpful.
That being said, perhaps this Luger was kept by a German citizen or ex-soldier immediately after WWI and they tried to grind off the date in an attempt to hide the original production date from the IMKK. Pure speculation by a rookie..
Definitely post more/better pics and ask questions. Read old threads. There is an amazing amount of knowledge available to you here.
-Jason
spripple33 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to spripple33 for your post:
Unread 10-30-2020, 11:50 AM   #4
spangy
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
spangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 617
Thanks: 3,065
Thanked 1,057 Times in 429 Posts
Default

Welcome to the forums Mikeinmi

Your wife is awesome for gifting you this Artillery luger

If you get time we would love to see images of the barrel where it meets the action and as many of the serial #'s inside and out as you have time for. There are some highly knowledgeable members here that will be able to tell you much about this gun ... a free appraisal so to speak.

I have no idea why someone would butcher the chamber date but sripples thoughts make good sense. As for the left grip replacement it may have had the dreaded 'million dollar chip' and was replaced thinking it makes the gun more desirable.
An original numbered chipped grip trumps a non-numbered intact replacement grip however.
Again pure speculation as to whether it was safety chipped or not.

The gun is over 100 years old and been used in WW I at least and perhaps WW II ... I hope I look this good at that age.
spangy is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to spangy for your post:
Unread 11-01-2020, 06:29 PM   #5
Mikeinmi
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

More pics added to original post.
https://imgur.com/a/ySGhVO8
Mikeinmi is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Mikeinmi for your post:
Unread 11-01-2020, 07:35 PM   #6
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,929
Thanks: 2,029
Thanked 4,527 Times in 2,090 Posts
Default

In the sixties it was felt that a stock lug on a artillery Luger was possible to be accused of having a short barrel rifle. So, many were ground off.
The 1916, I am unsure, if ground, it’d be gone.
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post:
Unread 11-02-2020, 11:49 AM   #7
Mikeinmi
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I did not know about lugs being ground off because of the possibility of being a SBR. That is too bad.
Mikeinmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2020, 12:57 PM   #8
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,696
Thanks: 792
Thanked 1,679 Times in 552 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeinmi View Post
I did not know about lugs being ground off because of the possibility of being a SBR. That is too bad.
Actually, the grinding of stock lugs began when the 1934 National Firearms Act was passed and it was forbidden to attach a shoulder stock to a handgun. My father and I discussed this back in the mid 1950's.

People misunderstood the law and thought that the stock lug, even if they didn't own a stock, made the gun illegal. I once owned a commercial alphabet Luger with a ground the stock lug. It was simply ignorance on the part of the gun's previous owner.

When I was 16 and in high school, I wrote a letter to the BATF asking about the paperwork necessary to own a C-96 Mauser and the shoulder stock. My father and I already had the gun and I knew who had a stock. Two FBI agents showed up at my father's workplace and he explained that I had written the letter which they found hard to believe. They then drove to my school and I was called out of class to the Principal's office where a very nervous Principal and VP were waiting with the two agents. They explained that I was too young to file the paperwork and that was that. I still own the C-96 more than 60 years later.

Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 11-02-2020, 02:36 PM   #9
spangy
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
spangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 617
Thanks: 3,065
Thanked 1,057 Times in 429 Posts
Default

Thanks for the added images Mikeinmi. ... Welcome to the Artillery club, I love em.

Here is my 1914 Erfurt LP08 Artillery



Nice Doubs ...a C-96 is on my shopping list.
spangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2020, 04:19 PM   #10
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

for a long period after 1934 until middle 1980's the only legal way to own a P08 or C96 with a shoulder stock in this country was to grind stock lug off of Luger + to hard weld stock groove on Mauser -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-02-2020, 04:58 PM   #11
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,696
Thanks: 792
Thanked 1,679 Times in 552 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
for a long period after 1934 until middle 1980's the only legal way to own a P08 or C96 with a shoulder stock in this country was to grind stock lug off of Luger + to hard weld stock groove on Mauser -
Please provide a reference for this as it's not true. Owning the gun and the stock at the same time was NOT illegal. Attaching the stock to the gun WAS illegal.

What you've said is no different than saying that owning a can of gasoline and a box of matches is illegal because it makes you an arsonist.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 6 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 11-02-2020, 06:31 PM   #12
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

it is absolutely true - refer to atf p5300.11 section III 1981 release - + other older ATF published ordinances - + 1968 + 1972 information release -
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	luger 3.jpg
Views:	195
Size:	156.9 KB
ID:	81135  

schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 5 members says Thank You to schutzen-jager for your post:
Unread 11-02-2020, 09:02 PM   #13
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,696
Thanks: 792
Thanked 1,679 Times in 552 Posts
Default

Thanks for the reference. I was mistaken. It wasn't until the 1990's that I actually owned the combination and by then they had been removed from the NFA list.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 11-03-2020, 12:52 PM   #14
sdmark777
User
 
sdmark777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 288
Thanks: 691
Thanked 672 Times in 174 Posts
Default

The ATF bulletin discussion of not having possession of both the stock and handgun (attached or not) is based upon the legal issue called "constructive possession". For example if you posses a non NFA registered short barrel rifle and remove the barrel, you are still in violation of the law based upon constructive possession. You may have the rifle or the short barrel individually, but not both. If you intend to make a short barrel rifle by replacing the barrel with a short one, you must wait for the NFA paperwork to be approved before you obtain the short barrel. As for the gasoline and box of matches that would not be constructive possession, as together they do not create a controlled item. So constructive possession does apply to numerous combinations of handguns and stocks, unless they are specifically exempted. Hope this helps.
sdmark777 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to sdmark777 for your post:
Unread 11-03-2020, 01:21 PM   #15
Mikeinmi
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Besides the lugs being ground off what do I have. Since they were ground off does it have no collector value? Should I just send it off to Thor and have it turned into a nice shooter? Thanks
Mikeinmi
Mikeinmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-03-2020, 02:35 PM   #16
ithacaartist
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
ithacaartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,339
Thanks: 7,263
Thanked 2,564 Times in 1,362 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeinmi View Post
Besides the lugs being ground off what do I have. Since they were ground off does it have no collector value? Should I just send it off to Thor and have it turned into a nice shooter? Thanks
Mikeinmi
It will always be classified as a shooter due its drastic departure from the condition in which it left the factory. All shooters are not equal in value, however. Restoration costs usually eat up any potential increase in shooter value, so it's more of an emotional decision than a economic one, so the decision to fix it back up is subjective, to say the least.

My first Luger is also an artillery, otherwise all original and matching, with a very nice finish-- with its lug ground off. GT was able to supply me with the back half of a grip frame, from which I can section out the appropriate area and install it on the Arty frame after the damaged area is excised. It should take a bit of TIG or micro-welding, then restoring the surface, and finally a touch-up of the involved work area's finish afterwards. I've seen pics of some of Thor's jobs in which he blended only the damaged portions of the finish to match the rest, and very nicely...so it's certainly possible.

Here's a link to the description of a guy's enterprise in which he builds up the area sufficiently with weld and then mills out a replacement lug where it should be, at $475 a pop. https://www.lugerforums.com/threads/...oration.40729/ Reconciling the finish would be next, and a further expense, so you can see what I mean about its needing to be a labor of love.
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894
ithacaartist is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to ithacaartist for your post:
Unread 11-03-2020, 02:51 PM   #17
Fla.Mallard
User
 
Fla.Mallard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 99
Thanks: 244
Thanked 95 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Tinker View Post
In the sixties it was felt that a stock lug on a artillery Luger was possible to be accused of having a short barrel rifle. So, many were ground off.
The 1916, I am unsure, if ground, it’d be gone.
I bought my first Luger in the early '70s and it was a mismatched 1917 Artillery. It consisted of an artillery for the top and ??? for the bottom. The lug was ground off (still is).
Fla.Mallard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-08-2020, 08:26 AM   #18
Vettom
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

FWIW I have a number of restoration and original Guns. If you like it considering the restoration costs you are restoring something no longer made back to as reasonably close as like new. Since profits are not a consideration restoring it would give you Avery nice shooting gift. IMHO. Once restoration is done should something happen a fire theft etc insurance company would be looking for a replacement of Equal condition. My artilleries are insured as Collectable. My thoughts are restoring the lug and make a very nice shooting piece. Thanks for reading.
Vettom is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Vettom for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com