![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,197
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
|
![]()
First the Stoeger...Not sure who actually manufactured it, as the Stoeger name is the only mfg marking...
Not a 'real' Luger, but possibly of some use here... ![]()
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... ![]() Last edited by sheepherder; 11-24-2014 at 10:38 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,197
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
|
![]()
Here's pics of a 'Stoeger .22 Luger' that sold on GA for $275...
![]()
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... ![]() Last edited by sheepherder; 11-24-2014 at 10:39 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,197
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
|
![]()
And here's the Erma .22 'Luger' schematic, for those [like me!] who don't do Facebook...
![]()
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,374
Thanks: 7,447
Thanked 2,613 Times in 1,380 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Rich, this helps to show folks that there are big differences between these .22 pistols. Not having paid much attention to the Stoeger design, I've noticed that it has many more internal parts than the Erma. More parts = more stuff to potentially go wrong, as a rule of thumb. But then again, the Ermas are able to achieve significant issues in operation, regardless of having fewer components to interact!
The Erma Ep- and La-22 have differences in trigger, trigger bar, sear and its housing and release, safety mechanism, and striker, and these parts are not interchangeable between models.
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,197
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
|
![]()
The Stoeger also has the gripframe and 'receiver' [barrel extension] integrated, and the barrel is fixed [pinned, not threaded]/does not recoil.
I would go out on a limb and guess that the integrated gripframe/'receiver' is also of Zinc alloy. Zamak perhaps???... Ah! Here's a quote from the Wiki - The first Stoeger Lugers were produced in 1969 with aluminum forging/machined frames (7075 T6 aluminum - tensile strength 82,000 p.s.i ). Beginning in 1980 the receiver material was changed to steel. One way to identify the frame type is by the safety selector markings. Steel frames will have a red and green painted indented spot while the aluminum frames will have raised lettering that says Fire or Safe. Use of a magnet is another way to identify the composition of the pistol frame. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoeger_Luger
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|