LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Off Topic & Other Firearms

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2013, 09:24 PM   #1
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Question Opinions needed: What happened to this P-38?

I bought this all matching AC 43 Walther P-38 last summer rather inexpensively.

It functions beautifully, I've put 500 rounds through it with literally only a few feeding issues. So I'm happy with it but it came with this bend back of that band on the front of the slide.

I've not only wondered how that happened but should I get it repaired? I doesn't seem to cause any function issue but aesthetically it looks weird.

I would figure that if the thing had blown up before it would not only be non functional anymore but also a lot more damaged.

So did it just get knocked hard on that band of metal and bent back or what? The person I bought it from did not know (or wouldn't tell me).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P-38_sv2_v1.jpg (165.4 KB, 126 views)
File Type: jpg P-38_dmg1_v1.jpg (189.8 KB, 128 views)
File Type: jpg P-38_dmg2_v1.jpg (163.9 KB, 124 views)
File Type: jpg P-38_dmg3_v1.jpg (190.3 KB, 105 views)
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 09:31 PM   #2
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
Default

It looks like a production error, which would not be unheard of in the German's haste to turn pistols out in 1943. I say this because there are no stress marks, cracks or folds, which would surely be evident if someone had tried to bend this after the initial cooling, hardening had taken place. If may have been overheated during production then was overly bent during machining.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 09:33 PM   #3
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Default

I think for it to be bent like that the slide/barrel would have to be removed. Since it is all matching it couldn't have been a barrel blow-up.
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 09:46 PM   #4
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alanint View Post
It looks like a production error, which would not be unheard of in the German's haste to turn pistols out in 1943. I say this because there are no stress marks, cracks or folds, which would surely be evident if someone had tried to bend this after the initial cooling, hardening had taken place. If may have been overheated during production then was overly bent during machining.
Thank you very much Doug, that makes total sense. Especially it making it out of the factory like that considering that time in the war.

Well then I may have found one with a little character, if only it could talk! I wonder if it ended up in the hands of some solder in disfavor but still needed? Or did it stay at the factory until after the war (if that is what this is)?
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 10:17 PM   #5
G.T.
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,541
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 3,740 Times in 1,020 Posts
Default fn slide

I can't tell for sure?? But I don't see a period after the P in P.38 ... the frame waffenampt shows late Mauser manufacture..what are the proofs marks on the slide right side and on the slide bottom at the back... might be an fn slide?? If so, a very rare gun...and might explain the deformation... Alanint is correct, looks bent then machined...part came that way..probably shouldn't be shooting it, any parts breakage will hurt the value.......til..lat'r...GT
G.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 11:09 PM   #6
Olle
User
 
Olle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 159
Thanked 664 Times in 318 Posts
Default

Seems like the actually is a crack on the right side....?
Olle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 12:16 AM   #7
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olle View Post
Seems like the actually is a crack on the right side....?
I think I know what you may be seeing as a crack is actually a towel fiber (there are a few, I thought I got them all). I haven't found any cracks.
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 12:35 AM   #8
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G.T. View Post
I can't tell for sure?? But I don't see a period after the P in P.38 ... the frame waffenampt shows late Mauser manufacture..what are the proofs marks on the slide right side and on the slide bottom at the back... might be an fn slide?? If so, a very rare gun...and might explain the deformation... Alanint is correct, looks bent then machined...part came that way..probably shouldn't be shooting it, any parts breakage will hurt the value.......til..lat'r...GT
You are correct there is no period after the P in P.38 on mine.

The pic is of the only right side markings and there are no markings on the slide bottom at the back that I can see.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P-38_rs_mkngs1_v1.jpg (170.4 KB, 108 views)
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 01:58 AM   #9
G.T.
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,541
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 3,740 Times in 1,020 Posts
Default Hi....

It appears to be an fn slide variation gun made in the last days of WW2. These were interspersed with ac 44 fn slides, byf 44 slides, and svw marked slides... it was originally all gray phosphate, with perhaps a dual tone blue barrel... If all matching and not import marked, I would keep it for a collectible.. or, if you want it nice, have Thor restore it... some, although I've never seen one, were reported to be all blue... cant really tell from your pictures.. But, nice gun, and the factory crudeness adds to the mystique, as it was uncommon, even very late in the war, for Mauser to let such a thing pass for issue... Best to you, til...lat'r....GT
G.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 02:26 AM   #10
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G.T. View Post
It appears to be an fn slide variation gun made in the last days of WW2. These were interspersed with ac 44 fn slides, byf 44 slides, and svw marked slides... it was originally all gray phosphate, with perhaps a dual tone blue barrel... If all matching and not import marked, I would keep it for a collectible.. or, if you want it nice, have Thor restore it... some, although I've never seen one, were reported to be all blue... cant really tell from your pictures.. But, nice gun, and the factory crudeness adds to the mystique, as it was uncommon, even very late in the war, for Mauser to let such a thing pass for issue... Best to you, til...lat'r....GT
Thanks for the info GT. It is all matching and there are no import markings.

I bought it at a gun show from guys who acquired guns from estate sales. I thought (and so did they) that it was a shooter so I got it for $600. I'll now consider not shooting it anymore (except for maybe every once in a while and only a few rounds).
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:09 AM   #11
MikeP
User
 
MikeP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ILL
Posts: 686
Thanks: 36
Thanked 452 Times in 198 Posts
Default

This apparantly from the locking block lug shearing off and wedging during recoil or return.
It is a CYQ, known to be thin at this point.

Ruint a good souvenier piece.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg blow 4.JPG (77.7 KB, 101 views)
File Type: jpg blow 3.JPG (46.1 KB, 98 views)
File Type: jpg blow 8.jpg (23.1 KB, 430 views)
MikeP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:38 AM   #12
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
Default

Mike,

CYQ's, (Spreewerk) are known to have this happen on occasion. The reason? Spreewerk was manned by mostly slave labor. Collector's have known for years to carefully inspect CYQ guns for flaws or carefully executed sabotage before firing.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 11:44 AM   #13
Ron Smith
User
 
Ron Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
Default

It appears there are cracks at the base of the yoke. I would guess a locking block failure at some point.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P-38_dmg2_v1.jpg (74.2 KB, 393 views)
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one.


What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said...
Ron Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 11:56 AM   #14
MikeP
User
 
MikeP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ILL
Posts: 686
Thanks: 36
Thanked 452 Times in 198 Posts
Default

I had owned that pistol over 40 years.
Used to fire it occaisionally with various ammo.

Using this commie stuff when it blew.


I have a bunch of original Lugers and a few P 38s I rarely fire anymore for this reason.

Been collecting and shooting 50 years and don't want any more paperweights.

Going to have a spring cleaning sale one of these days.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg blow 7.JPG (70.0 KB, 105 views)
MikeP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 12:28 PM   #15
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Smith View Post
It appears there are cracks at the base of the yoke. I would guess a locking block failure at some point.

I'll take a look again tonight and take it apart & take closer pics of those areas. I did clean more than a few towel fibers off of it yesterday but maybe those are actual cracks I didn't see!
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 12:46 PM   #16
SIGP2101
User
 
SIGP2101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 256
Thanks: 74
Thanked 67 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Yes picture #3 and #4 shows some crack developing on already pointed out areas. Take magnifying glass and carefully examine these two points. Somebody used that gun to try pry open something in the past. Is barrel original?
SIGP2101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 01:05 PM   #17
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGP2101 View Post
Yes picture #3 and #4 shows some crack developing on already pointed out areas. Take magnifying glass and carefully examine these two points. Somebody used that gun to try pry open something in the past. Is barrel original?
As far as the barrel being original it has matching serial numbers to the rest of the gun so it appears to be. Weird if someone used it to pry something open! And if it did have a locking block failure it isn't showing any other damage on the other parts.

Like I said in my first post I've already put 500 rounds through it with almost no issue. Of course if those are cracks (or probably even if they are not) I wont be firing it again!
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 01:49 PM   #18
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
Default

Is the locking block matching and undamaged? That would settle any locking block failure argument.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 02:40 PM   #19
MikeP
User
 
MikeP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ILL
Posts: 686
Thanks: 36
Thanked 452 Times in 198 Posts
Default

On my locking block failure, the little lug sheared and got jammed in the channel at the bottom of the slide.
This caused a spreading effect which tore the strap and visibly spread the slide at the front.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg blow 2.JPG (71.2 KB, 108 views)
File Type: jpg 107_0772.JPG (62.8 KB, 121 views)
MikeP is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to MikeP for your post:
Old 04-13-2013, 01:30 AM   #20
Shadowsix
User
 
Shadowsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 106
Thanks: 56
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Ok first of all I apologize for the quality of these pics, I need better lighting & an actual camera instead of my droid.


Olle, SIGP2101 & Ron Smith were right about the crack in the right side front (but not the left) of the slide, it is minor, does not extend inside but looks like someone tried to peen it to try to cover (or slow it) up the crack.

Funny thing is the locking block is not only original but from what I can see undamaged (but I'm sure someone here will know how to tell better) as are all the other parts!

So I guess that's the end of firing this guy. I would still be curious as to how it occurred unless the locking block failure was so minimal that the front of the slide is the only obvious damage?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Sld_ObliqueMrkd_v1.jpg (160.7 KB, 123 views)
File Type: jpg SldFrntMrkd_v1.jpg (181.9 KB, 100 views)
File Type: jpg LckBlk_BtmVw_v2.jpg (161.2 KB, 86 views)
File Type: jpg LckBlk_obliqFrnt_v1.jpg (156.0 KB, 113 views)
File Type: jpg LckBlk_RrVw_v1.jpg (163.3 KB, 114 views)
File Type: jpg LckBlk_SdVwObliq_v1.jpg (186.5 KB, 101 views)
File Type: jpg LckBlk_TpVw_v1.jpg (172.2 KB, 102 views)
Shadowsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com