LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-23-2010, 01:36 AM   #21
lugerftw
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default hope this helps

I am not good with a camera hope you can make it out.

Do you guys think it is a fake?

Thanks to all you all have a lot of knowledge that I can only work on learning.

Eric
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Luger269.jpg (116.8 KB, 57 views)
lugerftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2010, 02:08 AM   #22
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Eric,
I asked the same question years ago.
"If it's made after 1918 it's a reproduction" This is Ron's signature. It is at the bottom of all of his post. It's a tongue in cheek statememt.He is partial to early Lugers. It is the last year Erfurt and "DWM" made Lugers. DWM was renamed BKIW after WWI.
PS. Your Luger looks fine.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to MFC for your post:
Unread 06-23-2010, 02:58 AM   #23
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,119
Thanked 5,286 Times in 1,728 Posts
Default

That "signature" gets me in more trouble! I collect the early Imperial era Lugers. Up until 1918 Lugers were only manufactured by DWM and Erfurt. After WWI, manufacture was reverted to other firms (Mauser, Krieghoff, Simson, etc), therefore "original" Lugers by DWM and Erfurt were no longer made, only "repros"...it is a joke, but evidently not a very good one since I have to explain it.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Unread 06-23-2010, 09:04 AM   #24
lugerftw
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

oh ok I get it. Sorry since I am new I needed the extra info. Thank You very much for your time and effort in helping me.
lugerftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2011, 12:22 AM   #25
Bigthunder223
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have a Code 42 dated 1940 with straw colored trigger and other small parts. I was told by the previous owner it is all original. Is this possible or was the Luger refinished at some point? Thanks in advance.
Bigthunder223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2011, 02:02 AM   #26
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

David,
All 1940/42's were salt blued, dipped, including the small parts. The last of the military Lugers that were rust blued w/strawed small parts was in early 1937. Some of the commercials (Mauser Banners) were still rust blued after that.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-28-2011, 11:44 AM   #27
mecano44
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Hello

very usefull post Jan !!!!

I just got a 1940 42 code , all matching, with ( I think ) replaced grips.... according to your pictures the magazine should be of a "square" bottom type, with a small hole inside the"button "

My magazine look like those of the 1939 variation, that have "rounded" bottoms and no hole in the "button" .... there are any markings on the magazine body... Do I have a "reworked magazine " ?
strange thing : I got exactly the same type of magazine with a swiss 06/29 ( means the second swiss magazine had been replaced with a german one ) but with any marking ?? thanks for a replay
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1940 42 code AR.jpg (53.3 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg 1940 42 code BR.jpg (55.6 KB, 86 views)
mecano44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2011, 01:10 AM   #28
tharpo
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
tharpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 544
Thanks: 118
Thanked 383 Times in 158 Posts
Default

There was an overlap of two magazine types in early 1940 and both would be correct. One was stamped E/655 like yours. The other was stamped E/37 and 122 on the body and was the newer type. The bottom was center pinned.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg b 5039.jpg (110.0 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg 122 E37 Body.JPG (34.4 KB, 42 views)
tharpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2011, 03:28 AM   #29
mecano44
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 32
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Many thanks Tom for your information !

In fact I didn't realise that the hole on side of bottom was for the pinning.....


Would be fine if someone having a 42 in the same range of s/n, could tell me he has the same type of magazine
mecano44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com