LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Repairs, Restoration & Refinishing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-23-2011, 12:10 PM   #1
ithacaartist
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
ithacaartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,374
Thanks: 7,447
Thanked 2,613 Times in 1,380 Posts
Question Blasting of Lugers during refinishing

Happy Holidays, all...

While examining my shooter collection under magnification, I discovered that 3/5 of them display tiny peen marks indicating they have been blasted with some medium or other before the bluing was reestablished. The two '06 AEs and the 1917/1920 military P.08 were all treated this way. My 1917 LP.08 and Mauser Parabellum 29/70 are original finish, not showing evidence of this process.

My question is: Under what circumstances, other than modern re-dos, was blasting used by Luger manufacturers/arsenal reworks? Did they have a selection of media? What might be the time frame for use of the process--when devised, first commonly used, when and why used, etc.?

My impression is that it was not used in the original finishing of Lugers, but to clean them up for resale or re-issue. I can imagine importers and surplus outfits did this to improve their looks, and am wondering which category the work that was done to mine might fall into.

Another question is (a little off topic): What exactly is the finish that was applied to the Erma La/Ep .22s? It looks closer to the heavy dark bluing of the 29/70 Mauser, but was applied over diecast, of course, in this case.

David Parker
ithacaartist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-23-2011, 12:49 PM   #2
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
Default

I can comment on the .22 Erma pistols.
They are finished with a heavy, baked on enamel, not unlike some more modern pistols and SMGs.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-23-2011, 01:31 PM   #3
lugerholsterrepair
Moderator
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
lugerholsterrepair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,775
Thanks: 4,995
Thanked 3,133 Times in 1,439 Posts
Default

David..display tiny peen marks

If these are exactly as you say it is an indication of glass bead blasting. That is a relatively modern method.
__________________
Jerry Burney
11491 S. Guadalupe Drive

Yuma AZ 85367-6182


lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net

928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round
719 207-3331 (cell)


"For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know."
lugerholsterrepair is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-23-2011, 02:02 PM   #4
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

It sounds like what is offered as a matt blue finish. No buffing is required, just blast it and blue it (or black oxide) for a darker, almost matt black finish. Cheaper to do because less labor-intensive. I've only seen it done in conjunction with salt-bluing.
It does make a nice finish, just not "Luger nice".
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-25-2011, 01:30 AM   #5
Freischütz
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 125
Thanks: 9
Thanked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Default

I remember reading that someone simulated rust bluing by bead blasting and then applying modern hot blue. The bead blasted surface reflected the light differently.
Freischütz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-26-2011, 04:30 PM   #6
ithacaartist
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
ithacaartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,374
Thanks: 7,447
Thanked 2,613 Times in 1,380 Posts
Default

Thanks for the responses so far. I'm thinking it will be difficult to remediate the blasting marks, as they extend everywhere, even to the depths of the stamped numbers and proofs. Nobody bothered to smooth out the surface beforehand, so they are also evident on the little dings and scratches that existed before refinish. To smooth out the peening to a #400 or thereabouts finish will be difficult on all but broad surfaces, because of their universal presence; all else would seem to risk the sharpness of the edges--particularly those raised by stamping.

Doug, that's the answer I hoped for/expected. As long as I'm spiffing up the Ermas, I might give them a trip to the powder coater's. A very thin yet very durable formulation is available.
ithacaartist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-26-2011, 04:38 PM   #7
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

Several parts of the 1970s Mauser Parabellum were actually sandblasted during production.
Production step 735, part 1, shows that the front parts of the frame were to be sandblasted (Sanstrahlen).
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	sandblast.jpg
Views:	257
Size:	43.0 KB
ID:	23222  

Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
arsenal rework, refinishing, sandblasting


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com