LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-21-2006, 04:59 PM   #1
Aaron
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vista, CA
Posts: 1,008
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Default Durability of Post War Mauser Luger

I have a collection of post war Mauser Lugers, but I must confess that I have never fired one, since I regard them as collector guns only. I am curious to know if any forum members fire any of these pistols on a regular basis and can comment on their reliability, accuracy, and durability.
Aaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2006, 05:08 PM   #2
tracyp
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 391
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I have a 70's Mauser Luger that I fire all of the time. It's extremely accurate. It has the Swiss style grips which I don't like as much as the P08. As for durability, I've had the ejector and rear axle pin break. Other thank that it's been great.
tracyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2006, 06:01 PM   #3
mauro
FIREARM HISTORIAN AND AUT
 
mauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 106
Thanked 350 Times in 129 Posts
Default

Aaron,
As far as I know the Mauser Parabellum are absolutely very accurate. I know people that are used to fire with and the comments are enthusiastic.
__________________
Mauro Baudino - www.lugerlp08.com www.paul-mauser-archive.com
Mauser Company and Firearm Historian - Mauser Parabellum Certification Service.
mauro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2006, 06:57 PM   #4
Rod WMG
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have fired mine on two outings. It was very accurate, though it was a navy and 40 yards was the only range I had to try. It was about two feet high at that point with a variety of 115 gr. factory ammo.

On the second trip the ejector left for parts unknown.
Rod WMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2006, 09:55 PM   #5
Aaron
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vista, CA
Posts: 1,008
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Default

As requested, left side photo of Cartridge Counter magazine:
http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/dsc02453.jpg
Aaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2006, 10:23 PM   #6
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,040
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,256 Times in 1,724 Posts
Default

Aaron,
Thank you for the magazine photo.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2006, 11:15 PM   #7
lugerholsterrepair
Moderator
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
lugerholsterrepair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,775
Thanks: 4,995
Thanked 3,133 Times in 1,439 Posts
Default

Aaron, I do not have one of these but it is odd that both the extractor and the toggle pin are what has broken on my original P-08's. Of course I fire many thousands of rounds...Something is bound to break.

Tracy, do you really mean the ejector and not the extractor? I cannot emagine an ejector breaking, it has almost no stress. Whearas the extractor is inheriantly weak in it's design. Very thin in an important area. Jerry Burney
__________________
Jerry Burney
11491 S. Guadalupe Drive

Yuma AZ 85367-6182


lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net

928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round
719 207-3331 (cell)


"For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know."
lugerholsterrepair is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-22-2006, 12:33 PM   #8
tracyp
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 391
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Jerry,

It was the ejector. I don't know how it happened, but it didn't eject the next round. It must have caught on something. Anyway, I bought another one from Tom Heller ($50). I also bought the toggle pin from him. If you need parts for these, Tom's the guy.

Tracy
tracyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-22-2006, 12:53 PM   #9
Rod WMG
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I wrote "ejector" when I meant "extractor." Can't believe it; I just replaced it.
Rod WMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-22-2006, 01:09 PM   #10
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,966
Thanks: 2,066
Thanked 4,595 Times in 2,116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rod WMG
I wrote "ejector" when I meant "extractor." Can't believe it; I just replaced it.
I get the two mixed up all the time. If I sit and think, I know which is which, but normal talk and I get uhhhhh
Edward Tinker is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-22-2006, 02:28 PM   #11
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

Remember the broken parts shooting survey http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthre...n+parts+survey ? The ejector was the most-reported part failure, by a significant amount.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-28-2006, 09:29 PM   #12
Ponyman
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlantic County, NJ, USA
Posts: 138
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

The process commonly referred to as "strawing" is actually a mild form of temperring, which improves the elastic response of the metal. Of the small parts that fall in the straw category, only the ejector and the extractor are likely to be significantly distorted in the firing cycle. Strawing of the extractor was terminated early in the program. The high breakage rate of ejectors reported by Dwight may be an indication that - at least in the case of the ejector - strawing was not just cosmetic, but intended to prolong the life of the part. Is there any way to find out the straw condition of the parts reported as broken?
__________________
"The Constitution is intended for use by a moral and religious people.
It is wholly inadequate for the governance of any other."
~ John Quincy Adams
Ponyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-28-2006, 09:48 PM   #13
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ponyman
Is there any way to find out the straw condition of the parts reported as broken?
Your assessment of the hardness situation is a good one. I'm sure at this point you'd have to do a new survey particularly for the "straw condition" information.

And I'm not sure that it wouldn't be a red herring, in any case. I don't imagine that the remaining straw is any indication of the change of hardness of the part (if any); straw is a surface color effect which can fade even by long-term exposure to light.

I can report that one ejector which broke on a G-date I used to own was polished white, and only the tipbroke off--it was still functional. The still-strawed ejector which was on the S/42 I shoot broke behind the ejection tab, as did the no-straw-remaining replacement, in short order.

This gun currently has a blued ejector, which brings up another point. From 1937 on these parts were blued, so even though they may have tempered them to straw temperature, the straw itself was covered--probably polished off in order to take salt-blue.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-29-2006, 09:27 AM   #14
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,155
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,308 Times in 1,098 Posts
Default

Gentlemen,

I agree with Dwight's last statement... in 1937, the German war machine dropped strawing as a firearm finish because it was too expensive a process and went to salt bluing of all the parts. Mauser's only exception to this are the commercial or contract pistols sold after 1937, where standard civilian finish was used, presumeably because the customer was paying the premium cost for the additional process.

IMHO, I don't think that their military would have intentionally changed the finishing process if it would have meant more parts breakage in the field on high impact parts what were not strawed...

Is my logic flawed here? Your opinions please.
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-29-2006, 02:14 PM   #15
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

Hi,

Most failed ejectors I've seen, failed the same way. The metal just behind the ejecting triangle will become fatigued and will slowly crack, pushing the ejecting triangle slightly inwards. Which is a bit surprising, really.

The Germans must've had tons of replacement ejectors for them and I dare to say that there are very, very few lugers still have the ejector they left the factory with.

Some broken ejectors I save, along with a firing pin retainer:

Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com