my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
01-26-2015, 12:05 PM | #1 |
New User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
My first Luger - an M23 Finn
I bought this M23 off Gunbroker last week for $830. Seems like a lot for a mixmaster but I have a soft spot for Finnish firearms and really wanted a Luger that I could shoot without worrying about breaking a part on an all matching gun. Since this is my first Luger, I am still learning and would be interested in any comments or observations you might care to make. I beleive that it started life as a 1920s commercial (alphabet) luger. I've attached a link to lots of photos. Here's what I think I know :
•Serial number appears to be 3138q but the q is very faint having been partially scrubbed or lightly stamped. Please take a look and see what you think. If it is a q, that number would fit nicely with other M23s on the sticky list, 3139q was an SA stamped M23 in .30 cal. •3 3/4" Tikka barrel is bright and shiny •Loads and shoots great •No import stamps •Side plate numbered 51 •Take down liver numbered 11 •Trigger is the only matching part (38) •Most other numbers have been scrubbed. •41 dated barrel extension with a strange, purple brownish finish. Seems strange that the 41 was not scrubbed and the part reparked. Maybe it was an urgent repair during the Continuation War? •Faint crown over N on the toggle •A "T" shaped stamp mark in two spots on the inside of the receiver. An "X" in one spot •Many SA stamps visible. Looks like it might have gone through many, many refurbs •Safety lever chipped LH grip. Empty spot for brass tag on RH. Neither are numbered •Wood bottom mag with two different numbers, neither matching the receiver. •Marks on the bottom of the toggle seem to match those on the receiver, making me think it really is a DWM receiver. •Finnish front sight with rear notch widened to match Here's a link to the photos: http://s273.photobucket.com/user/DRM...innish%20Luger Last edited by drman60; 01-26-2015 at 01:01 PM. Reason: Fix link to pictures |
01-26-2015, 12:29 PM | #2 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
Link is not working for me.
dju |
01-26-2015, 01:02 PM | #3 |
New User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Fixed link. Thanks for catching that.
|
01-26-2015, 01:41 PM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 133
Thanks: 8
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
|
That's a very decent price for a finn luger. I've been meaning to pick up one in .30 mauser to complement my 4 3/4" 9mm. Frankly, I'm JEALOUS!
They bring a premium over a regular mixed shooter, and I haven't seen one for under $1k in a while. Mine also has some plum coloring showing, although it is a commercial DWM while yours appears to be part Mauser. The finns are chock full of history, most have refurb Tikka barrels in exc/new condition AND provide guilt-free shooting. Love 'em! |
01-26-2015, 01:45 PM | #5 |
New User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for the comments. What part appears to be part Mauser?
|
01-26-2015, 02:05 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 133
Thanks: 8
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
|
I am by no means an expert, but I think that "41" is not a chamber date. I believe that is the Mauser production code.
I will defer to the real experts to chime in... By the way, if you search for info on finnish lugers on this forum and the other one, there is a gentleman who was writing a book on Finn handguns that is chock full of interesting data. He had at one point listed in PDF format. |
01-26-2015, 03:07 PM | #7 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
We'll have to wait for real experts, but the barrel extension with "41" is Mauser, and that is what's referred to as the 2 digit date, for 1941 obviously. You aren't showing the top of the toggle, so I'm not sure about the rest. The grip frame/receiver is definitely not LATE Mauser.
dju |
01-26-2015, 04:36 PM | #8 |
New User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
02-16-2015, 06:58 PM | #9 |
New User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: California
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Great pictures
|
02-21-2015, 08:20 AM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
A little bit curious on Finnish stuffs. How do you know it's created by Finnish? Just by that triangle on the barrel?
|
02-21-2015, 10:23 AM | #11 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,019
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,173 Times in 1,701 Posts
|
That plus the Finn front sight and right grip inlet for a brass unit ID disk.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
02-21-2015, 12:21 PM | #12 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
drman. Without seeing the frame, it's hard to say if your Finnish luger started off life as one of the 5000 m23 7.65mm Commericals sold to them by DWM. Even if the frame is DWM, with the 41 dated mauser receiver and Finnish made 9mm barrel, it has been highly modified. TH
|
02-21-2015, 02:26 PM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
|
I agree with Tom, I would ask you to post some more close and detailed pictures of it.
Sergio
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list. |
02-21-2015, 07:03 PM | #14 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 250
Thanks: 77
Thanked 52 Times in 31 Posts
|
Put together during the WWII. Germans and Finns were together against the soviets.
Not a m/23. |
Tags |
finnish, luger, m23, p08 |
|
|