LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Repairs, Restoration & Refinishing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-28-2012, 03:47 PM   #1
c141b
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default toggles hitting hard on frame

I have been reading about how hard a toggle should hit the frame so I tried the tape method. I have 2 lugers; the first set of 3 pictures is a S42 luger. I was shooting Winchester white box 9mm 115 gr. The luger functions great, it cycles, and locks open on empty. It appears to hit harder on the left side of the frame.
The second set of 3 pictures is a commercial DWM 1920’s .30 cal.luger I was shooting Fiocchi 93 gr. The luger functions great, it cycles, and locks open on empty. It appears to hit harder on the left side of the frame. I tore the tape on the right side getting it off.
From the way the toggles are hitting, it appears I need new springs? Wolf looks like the best pick, a 38 lb. for the 9mm and a 36lb. for the .30 cal.
I would appreciate any input! From what I have been reading the .30 cal is a hard spring to get to function correctly.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	mainspring po8 005.jpg
Views:	179
Size:	71.0 KB
ID:	25360  

Click image for larger version

Name:	mainspring po8 009.jpg
Views:	170
Size:	97.9 KB
ID:	25361  

Click image for larger version

Name:	mainspring po8 010.jpg
Views:	182
Size:	91.8 KB
ID:	25362  

c141b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-28-2012, 03:53 PM   #2
c141b
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default commercial DWM .30 cal.

here is the second set of pictures
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	mainspring po8 011.jpg
Views:	186
Size:	80.5 KB
ID:	25365  

Click image for larger version

Name:	mainspring po8 014.jpg
Views:	181
Size:	114.2 KB
ID:	25366  

Click image for larger version

Name:	mainspring po8 016.jpg
Views:	172
Size:	89.5 KB
ID:	25367  

c141b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-28-2012, 04:45 PM   #3
Thor
User
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Posts: 4,583
Thanks: 958
Thanked 970 Times in 276 Posts
Default

Needs a stronger main spring IMO. Wolff Springs sells them. How high is the ejection of brass? That can be another sign. If more than 8'-10' might be too weak on the spring. The 9mm looks like it is hitting harder or has been hit more times.
__________________
Thor's Luger Clinic http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/
Ted Green (Thor Yaller Boots)
725 Western Hills Dr SE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124
915-526-8925 Email
thor340@aol.com
-----------------------------------
John3:3
Jesus answered and said to him, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-28-2012, 06:02 PM   #4
saab-bob
User
 
saab-bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: So Cal
Posts: 459
Thanks: 774
Thanked 143 Times in 87 Posts
Default

Thor
I have a dumb question.
Do you recommend putting some kind of lubricent or grease on the front of the ears to help the toggle flip up? I have never done this as I never realized the toggle can actually bang the frame ears hard enough to deform them.
Does this happen on all lugers or just ones with weak springs or from shooting ammo that is too hot?
I am a big fan of keeping everything lubed.(that sounded weird!)
Thanks
Bob
__________________
"I think,therefore I own guns"
saab-bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-28-2012, 06:02 PM   #5
c141b
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thor thanks for the quick response. I can’t recall how far the brass went. I think I will get the service pack from Wolf, for the Lugers. Thanks
c141b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-28-2012, 11:41 PM   #6
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,017
Thanks: 1,089
Thanked 5,164 Times in 1,700 Posts
Default

Guess I have been misinformed. I thought that the "tape test" was conducted by applying the tape to the back of the frame where the rear toggle link impacts to stop the motion of the toggle. A heavy strike there indicates a weak main spring. A heavy strike on the ramp/camming surface of the frame might indicate that the mainspring is quite strong and the toggle knobs, which are held down partially by the strength of the spring, need more force to "break" them upward to unlock the action. Most likely I am wrong...wouldn't be the first time.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Unread 03-29-2012, 07:03 AM   #7
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Wood View Post
I thought that the "tape test" was conducted by applying the tape to the back of the frame where the rear toggle link impacts to stop the motion of the toggle.
+ 1

I must be uninformed too, as I can clearly remember the thread w/pics showing the tape and strike marks on the back of the frame...

I guess it's true about a mind being a terrible thing to waste...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post:
Unread 03-29-2012, 07:54 AM   #8
alvin
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Make 100% sense to me. That rear extruding of the 3rd toggle link must be there to perform "bolt stop" function. Weaker main spring should have more recoil energy left, absorbed by the rear end of the 3rd link impacting with the frame, and leaves deeper mark on the rear of the frame.
alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to alvin for your post:
Unread 03-29-2012, 08:16 AM   #9
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
Default

Agreed. The test depicted may very well show a too strong recoil spring. It would be instructivce to see that the back of the frame looks like. Perhaps no marks at all?
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to alanint for your post:
Unread 03-29-2012, 05:57 PM   #10
Thor
User
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Posts: 4,583
Thanks: 958
Thanked 970 Times in 276 Posts
Default

Makes sense to me. Interesting.......things that make you go hmmmmm! Sometimes too strong of a main spring will sometimes, not always, show up in failures to eject, or weak ejections. If the ejection is too strong, and I have seen brass launching a good 15' straight up, you are hammering the gun too hard and take a chance on breaking the ejector. This is assuming a standard load is used, if you start using different pressure loadings you add more variables to the equation. SHEESH.......this is making my head hurt!
__________________
Thor's Luger Clinic http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/
Ted Green (Thor Yaller Boots)
725 Western Hills Dr SE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124
915-526-8925 Email
thor340@aol.com
-----------------------------------
John3:3
Jesus answered and said to him, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-29-2012, 11:32 PM   #11
JTD
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 425
Thanks: 217
Thanked 408 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Seems the knuckle is not breaking soon enough. Spring too strong? Think how the toggle lock works on early models though.Back, then up. John
JTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-30-2012, 06:14 AM   #12
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
Default

I changed the springs in one of my shooters after it broke its third lightbulb above the shooting station at the local indoor range. (with some urging from the range owner).

Forceful, straight up ejection.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-30-2012, 12:51 PM   #13
c141b
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Help I am now confused?

I am now confused about the tape thing. The tape test for a weak spring is to put the tape on the rear receiver where the rear toggle link tail hits the back face of the receiver? I read the e-book on lugers and it said this: The toggle knobs reach and follow the ascending slopes at the rear of the frame, the toggle joint is accelerated rapidly up past dead center. The rear slopes of the receiver and other areas which can give good clues to knowing whether the gun was used intensively. Repetitive strikes of the toggle knobs against the slopes progressively crush polish them. In some rare cases of heavy use, the metal can be deformed. On the other end of this wear spectrum a luger with little use, the receiver slopes are still retaining almost all their blue finish. On the subject of the rear toggle link’s tail, the e-book said that with time traces of wear appear on the back face of the receiver. These traces are good indicators whether or not the pistol was fired a lot. So here is the question, if repetitive strikes of the toggle knobs on the slopes over time causes wear, then this is only a sign of heavy use? Then using the tape method on the back of the receiver is the best way to check for weak spring? If it passes the tape test then leave the spring alone?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	mainspring po8 017.jpg
Views:	169
Size:	91.8 KB
ID:	25407  


Last edited by c141b; 03-30-2012 at 12:55 PM. Reason: add one more line.
c141b is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-30-2012, 09:27 AM   #14
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,153
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
Default

I concur that the ear pounding seen in the photos is the result of weak springs, likely combined with hotter ammo than the gun was designed for...
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-30-2012, 10:12 AM   #15
Thor
User
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Posts: 4,583
Thanks: 958
Thanked 970 Times in 276 Posts
Default

You can break ejectors, I know!
__________________
Thor's Luger Clinic http://members.rennlist.com/lugerman/
Ted Green (Thor Yaller Boots)
725 Western Hills Dr SE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124
915-526-8925 Email
thor340@aol.com
-----------------------------------
John3:3
Jesus answered and said to him, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God."
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-30-2012, 12:27 PM   #16
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

+1 on the straight up ejection. Most of my spent cases never land, but end up on top of the false ceiling at the shooting stand.

Ejectors and extractors break, it's a fact of life. Something to consider when shooting your luger. Parts will wear out and break. Simple as that. Did that in the old days, will do that today.
Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-31-2012, 06:05 PM   #17
Michael Zeleny
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Michael Zeleny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 525
Thanks: 129
Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlim View Post
Ejectors and extractors break, it's a fact of life. Something to consider when shooting your luger. Parts will wear out and break. Simple as that. Did that in the old days, will do that today.
One more reason to favor the W+F 06/29 with its strengthened, drop-in extractor!
__________________
Michael Zeleny@post.harvard.edu -- http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ -- 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 -- 323.363.1860
All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett
Michael Zeleny is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-31-2012, 09:57 AM   #18
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

The tape test is indeed performed at the rear of the frame, not in the toggle area (although it is a nice test to check the 'balance' of both toggle knobs. If one is out of sync with the other, it will cause the gun to shoot slighly to the left or right, depending on the knob.

Matching the knobs to the frame is critical for accuracy, and Mauser got their new Parabellum parts tolerances to such a high degree that they only had to match the rear toggle with the frame/receiver. That is the reason why on the MP only the rear toggle part has part of the serial number engraved on it.

But back to the test. If the main spring is to weak to slow the toggle down, or the ammunition is too spicy (fast burning powders or too much powder), the toggle will flex past it's stopping point, leaving a clearer marking on the rear of the frame. This is checked with the 'tape test'. It shows how hard the rear end of the toggle hits the frame.

The initial powders developed for the Parabellum pistol were basically rifle powders and had a slower burning rate than the modern pistol powders. This produces a different pressure curve, which produces different recoil characteristics.

The shape and location of the frame ear curves have been altered a number of times. The Swiss especially experimented heavily with the curve shape, and the 06/29 shape was tuned to that particular pistol, barrel length, spring and ammunition. Mauser, who based their 1970s design on the 06/29 found that the Swiss curve was ideal for the 06/29 but gave difficulties with other barrel lenghts and calibres. They eventually moved the Swiss curve a few millimeters to the rear in order to avoid further recoil issues.
Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 7 members says Thank You to Vlim for your post:
Unread 03-31-2012, 11:57 AM   #19
alvin
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlim View Post
If one is out of sync with the other, it will cause the gun to shoot slighly to the left or right, depending on the knob.
I am surprised on this one....

When the knob touches the ramp, is the bullet still in barrel?
alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-31-2012, 04:26 PM   #20
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

Alvin, repeat shots will 'walk' to the left or right with rapid firing.

The C96 had a similar problem initially, but there the 'wobble' was in a vertical direction.
Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com