![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 15
Thanks: 21
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Hello All,
I'm a 34 year old gun enthusiast/collector based out of Florida. I only collect military firearms with a focus on WW2. I recently acquired my first Luger. It's a byf 41 with a properly stamped fxo magazine with nonserialized black bakelite bottom. I bought it from the grandson of a US Army officer that graduated West Point in 1944 (would finish his military career a Captain), immediately was sent to Europe, and returned in 1945. Along the way, he acquired this Luger and brought it back to the states, so the story goes. It came with a holster and a second magazine that doesn't match the gun, but may belong with the holster, which I don't believe matches the gun based on my limited knowledge and research (will make another post for that). The gun, including the grips, shows up a little darker in these pictures than they really are. I haven't fully stripped it down to check the serial numbers on internal parts, but all numbers on exterior match. I am having trouble confidently identifying the serial number suffix. I have included some pictures for reference. I originally thought it was a "f", but upon further research, I now believe it to be a "t". Already planning on my next Luger purchase, which I would like to be a S/42 version. Thanks in advance for any help. Last edited by Geladen; 01-26-2024 at 10:45 PM. |
|
|
|
| The following 4 members says Thank You to Geladen for your post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nampa, Idaho
Posts: 642
Thanks: 854
Thanked 957 Times in 373 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 15
Thanks: 21
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 544
Thanks: 118
Thanked 383 Times in 158 Posts
|
Yes that is a "t".
|
|
|
|
| The following 3 members says Thank You to tharpo for your post: |
|
|
#5 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 15
Thanks: 21
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 15
Thanks: 21
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Slightly better picture of the left side of the gun. More to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Wrong side of the Delaware river
Posts: 335
Thanks: 235
Thanked 478 Times in 189 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to Kiwi for your post: |
|
|
#8 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 15
Thanks: 21
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Finally did a partial takedown of the gun. Wanted to get s look at the inside and verify some more matching numbers. Looks to be all matching from what I've seen. More to come.
|
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to Geladen for your post: |
|
|
#9 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamer, Idaho
Posts: 295
Thanks: 28
Thanked 55 Times in 27 Posts
|
Those are really great close up pictures and so clear. How did you get such good pictures if you don't mind me asking?
Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 15
Thanks: 21
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
I was using the camera on my phone, a Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. They take pretty high quality pictures so you can zoom in quite a bit without losing much quality. Phones these days have some pretty decent cameras on them. |
|
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to Geladen for your post: |
![]() |
|
|