LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-03-2003, 06:50 PM   #1
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Post Any Opinions...???

http://www.gmartin-auctions.com/premdec03/lot1363.html

Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-03-2003, 07:16 PM   #2
SteveM
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 94
Thanked 275 Times in 137 Posts
Post

Pete,
Looks to me like the pistol has been fired evidenced by the tell-tale marks on rear of frame.
The grips also, at least to me, just don't look quite right. Maybe the checkering is just to coarse.
SteveM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-03-2003, 09:27 PM   #3
PANZERSOLDAT
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CLARKSVILLE, TN
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

I am just a novice collector, but the strawing looks almost too good for a pistol this age. If finish is original someone has stored it right for a century! I hope mine survive a 100 in this shape! OOPS! I have fired all of mine at least once...OK...maybe twice.
PANZERSOLDAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-03-2003, 11:59 PM   #4
Imperial Arms
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Malta, EU
Posts: 579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Post

It's a tough call to make an accurate opinion of this Luger based on the images, but I see some 'pros and cons':

Pros: This M1900 Luger could be considered acceptable as a gift or presentation to a president without having a 'GL' hallmark. There was no specific serial range for early M1900 Lugers which have the owners initials above the chamber. In regards to the condition, it appears to be original based on the sharpness of the BUG proof marks under the barrel and the sharpness of the high edges on the sideplate. I do like the small amount of patina/discoloration on the straw of the takedown lever. I do not have any question on the quality of the grips which look fine to me.

Cons: The fire-blue on the grip screws are to good to believe and they could have been refinished separately. However, the fire-blue on the breechblock pin looks correct.

My father and I used to own a .22 caliber free pistol which used to be owned by President deAlvear, but it was stolen during a robbery in our home many years ago. My father found it in Argentina during an offical meeting in that country. It was a custom made pistol and had a single digit serial number. The information on the web site provided me with some useful information.

It will be interesting to discover what price this pistol will fetch in the auction.

Cheers,
Albert
Imperial Arms is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-04-2003, 01:28 AM   #5
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,988
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts
Post

Looks like a good one to me. Anybody have 15 Grand they don't need?
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-04-2003, 12:41 PM   #6
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
Post

Well I LIKE IT! Provenance or not...

It MAY have been fired... but maybe not. The marks on the rear of the frame may only indicate that the toggle has been manipulated by hand...

What a nice Luger!
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-08-2003, 10:45 PM   #7
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Post

There appears to be a very small "DE" in the middle of the chamber engraving...

Any thoughts as to what this might mean...?

I think I picked up the photo jpeg when this gun was on display at Reno a year or so, ago...


Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2003, 12:21 AM   #8
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,988
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts
Post

Considering the overall excellent quality of the chamber monogram inlay, the "DE" is very crude and not centered on the horizontal bar of the "A". I would guess it is an amateur marking by a previous owner and not the signature of the engraver.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2003, 01:38 AM   #9
Imperial Arms
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Malta, EU
Posts: 579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Post

Any idea what this item fetched at the auction yesterday?

Albert
Imperial Arms is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2003, 11:41 AM   #10
Lugerdoc
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Lugerdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
Post

The engraved letters appear to be M A O Since I doubt that Mao se Tung had anything to do with a M1900 luger, my best WAG, would be a Spanish language name such as Manual Obergon de Arragon.
__________________
Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302
Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net
Lugerdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2003, 01:44 PM   #11
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,988
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts
Post

I went back and looked at the Greg Martin auction listing an saw that the attribution of the presentation piece is to Marcelo Te deAlvear, former president of Argentina, and the monogram reads "MTdeA", although I am hard pressed to make a "T" out of the stylized representation of that letter. That would explain the "DE" on the crossbar of the "A" in the monogram (DE Alvear). But it does, in my opinion, look a bit crude in execution compared to the rest of the monogram, hence my observation in my previous post above.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2003, 01:54 PM   #12
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Post

Hello Albert,

The auction results seem to be udpated to the G-M Auction web site only a few months after the event.

Unless the lucky buyer is a LF member and wants to divulge the info...earlier...

Regards,

Pete <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2003, 10:12 AM   #13
Lugerdoc
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Lugerdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
Post

Ron, I agree that I don't see a "T" (rather an "O") so I doubt that the atributed Argentine presidente is correct. Th
__________________
Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302
Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net
Lugerdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2003, 11:25 AM   #14
Imperial Arms
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Malta, EU
Posts: 579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Post

I agree that I do not see a 'T' either, therefore, unlikely the Argentine President. In my opinion, if the name included a 'de', it would probably be left out and only the main initials used 'MTA' on the chamber engraving. Furthermore, the 'de' looks very crude and not the workmanship of a German engraver at DWM.

When tiny details start to surface which look suspicious, I wonder who was confident to buy this Luger? If the engraved letters used a gold/silver/gold pattern, I have never seen this type of combination on presentation chamber markings which are usually all gold.

Albert
Imperial Arms is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2003, 01:25 PM   #15
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,988
Thanks: 1,067
Thanked 5,099 Times in 1,676 Posts
Post

I suspect that this Luger has good provenance and is probably documented. The inlayed monogram is actually made of various colors of gold that is achieved by alloying the gold with various amounts of silver and copper. The silver colored â??Aâ? might actually be platinum. The â??Mâ? is yellow gold, the highly stylized â??Tâ? (which really more resembles an M rather than a T) is white gold slightly tinted yellow, and the â??Oâ? is really a cartouche to â??fancy upâ? the monogram and is in red gold which has a slightly higher percentage of copper. These differences in coloration are more easily seen in the auction pictures than in Peteâ??s enlarged picture. This combination of colored gold in firearm inlays is rare but not unprecedented.

The â??DEâ? in the crossbar of the A is also more defined in the auction picture, so I think that it may have been distorted and caused look cruder because of the rotation and enlargement of the auction picture.

It could be a fake, but I believe it is genuine.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2003, 03:04 PM   #16
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Post

Here is the photo of the chamber from the G-M Auction web site :



The previous photo I posted was a different photo and not just an enhanced photo of the G-M Auction house photo...

Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2003, 07:43 PM   #17
Imperial Arms
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Malta, EU
Posts: 579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Post

I could have not described it better than Ron, and for this reason, I allowed him do all the explaining on the different tones of gold!

After considering the various comments mentioned above, it can be observed that there is a 'M' and an 'A', but the oval shape is likely a cartouche figure, and not a letter 'O', as explained by Ron. Therefore, the lettering is apparently 'MA' with the small 'de' in the center with an oval cartouche in the background.

To the best of my knowledge, the correct way to spell the president's name is 'Marcelo deAlvear' (not de Alvear) and, therefore, the initials should have probably been engraved as 'MD' at DWM. On the other hand, to create an attractive chamber engraving, the engraver at DWM probably believed that interwining the letters 'M' and 'A' was better than using 'M' and 'D'. It is known that many Spanish names have a 'de' which is important for the complete name and, therefore, it was necessary to include the 'de' somewhere in the engraving.

I notice that the rear of the extractor (near the pin) has some darker discoloration, and I wonder if this can be acceptable for DWM standards, especially on a M1900 Luger? I wonder if the extractor could have been restrawed since the grip screws are also suspicious in the fire-blue?

Albert
Imperial Arms is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-11-2003, 09:54 AM   #18
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
Post

Albert,

I believe that the darker color at the rear of the extractor may be due to lighting conditions at the time the photograph was taken. This area appears to be to the left of the light source and would be somewhat in a shadow from the hump on the breechblock.

While it is certainly possible that the extractor and grips screws have been refinished, I don't see how it would be possible to determine that for sure.

Is there some test that could tell us if this has happened? I know that Tom Armstrong does some oxidation testing to determine the authenticity of the finish on Navy Lugers, but I have never heard of this type of testing being done on strawed parts or fireblued parts...

just my
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-13-2003, 01:37 PM   #19
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Post

The G-M Auctin folks got their auction pricing results posted up on their web site in record time (thanks, Doc Fisher for the tip...) :

http://www.gmartin-auctions.com/dec03prices.html

This presentation luger (auction stock # 1363) apparently did not sell...as it is not listed in the sold results...

Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com