LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-29-2013, 10:23 AM   #1
sej-gun
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 99
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Default 1914 DWM

I came across this nice P.08 DWM 1914 sn: 6091a. Böhler barrel (Bö.32).

Reg. Jes
Attached Images
File Type: jpg p.08dwm1914 010.jpg (180.0 KB, 72 views)
File Type: jpg p.08dwm1914 009.jpg (168.6 KB, 80 views)
sej-gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-29-2013, 03:13 PM   #2
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,974
Thanks: 2,072
Thanked 4,608 Times in 2,123 Posts
Default

It is much better to start a new thread, then tack on your posting on an older thread...
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-29-2013, 05:00 PM   #3
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
Default

Those halos just don't look right. It looks like the ol" blueing remover boost.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-29-2013, 05:18 PM   #4
Maestro
User
 
Maestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: "Where the streets have no names"
Posts: 504
Thanks: 192
Thanked 200 Times in 136 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alanint View Post
Those halos just don't look right. It looks like the ol" blueing remover boost.
it does look a bit strange
Attached Images
File Type: jpg attachment.jpg (102.5 KB, 64 views)
Maestro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-29-2013, 07:00 PM   #5
JTD
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 428
Thanks: 218
Thanked 410 Times in 151 Posts
Default

I think they are ok, judging by the overall finish. They are just well pronounced halos to begin with, and highlighted by photography.
JTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-30-2013, 01:40 AM   #6
ithacaartist
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
ithacaartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,400
Thanks: 7,555
Thanked 2,643 Times in 1,393 Posts
Default

As I said on the other thread for this gun, too pronounced, too even/regular, too well-defined. The edges of them should fade away more gradually, and they just look too darned big. If they can be made to appear more "normal" with different lighting, I might be happier with them. I know that flash can cause some weird effects when photographing surface finish...
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894
ithacaartist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-30-2013, 10:41 AM   #7
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

I lost the other thread, but IIRC it had a reference/pic of a Bohler Bo30 barrel as well as a Bo32...I believe these indicate different steel alloys, but I don't have a reference that lists the composition of Bohler-named steels. But they would respond differently.

Alloys are interesting. If you make and name a certain alloy and copyright the name, then anyone who markets their steel and uses your name has to pay you a royalty. CPM154, 530V, and BG-42 are all good examples (all used in knife blades). In England, Reynolds 531 is a common structural alloy for race cars. You can make the steel/alloy and even sell it, but not use another mfg's brandname. I actually buy my steel, aluminum, copper, and Delrin [there's another brandname!] from a Krupp subsidiary, and they are careful not to infringe on other makers brandnames...

...But I digress...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-30-2013, 10:56 AM   #8
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
Default

The Böhler number does not indicate a different alloy, it's the hardness number on the Böhler Scale, a proprietary system similar to the more familiar Rockwell Scale.
Regards, Norm
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Norme for your post:
Unread 12-30-2013, 11:00 AM   #9
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norme View Post
The Böhler number does not indicate a different alloy, it's the hardness number on the Böhler Scale, a proprietary system similar to the more familiar Rockwell Scale.
Regards, Norm
Thanks for the correction Norm!

I still think that the physical appearance would be different between the two, as regards to bluing and aging.
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 02:57 AM   #10
Geo99
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 400
Thanks: 102
Thanked 127 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Böhler 32 is a very hard steel. How does the bore look?

These halos look funny to me also, but for some different reason -

Most people may not be aware of this, but there should be bluing down in the barrel stamping grooves. From the picture, it looks like the blue has been washed out, which is not normal for an original gun. You will probably need a loupe to see it.

I have several guns where the halos have sharp edges, but these look way too obvious and round. And they are around EVERY number on the barrel, which is not normally what I have observed on other guns.

I fear I have given away too much information already.
__________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying nice doggie, until you can find a rock."
- Will Rogers
Geo99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 10:23 AM   #11
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo99 View Post
I fear I have given away too much information already.
Perhaps a page or two in the upcoming 'Waffenfabrik Amerika: Handbuch für Mechaniker'...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post:
Unread 01-01-2014, 10:56 AM   #12
sej-gun
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 99
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Hello good forum friends first Happy New Year to you all!

And new photo without extra light, hope this is better.
I have no doubt there is bluing in the letters and numbers
The bore is, as rest of the gun, in fine condition.

Reg. Jes
(without 2/1 - 14)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1050618.jpg (93.2 KB, 53 views)

Last edited by sej-gun; 01-02-2014 at 02:04 AM.
sej-gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 11:22 AM   #13
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Geo99:
"Most people may not be aware of this, but there should be bluing down in the barrel stamping grooves. From the picture, it looks like the blue has been washed out, which is not normal for an original gun. You will probably need a loupe to see it."

Are you referring to the bare metal in the right side of the "9"?
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 11:31 AM   #14
sej-gun
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 99
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Few more Photos with white Tush in the markings
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1050623.jpg (100.1 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg P1050627.jpg (166.8 KB, 57 views)
sej-gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 05:01 PM   #15
CJS57
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Thanks: 0
Thanked 81 Times in 41 Posts
Default

I think he is saying there should be blue in and at the bottom of the little miniature "trench" made by the number punch.

The thing is it is near impossible to tell if halos are original or fake from internet pictures. Only a hands on exam will do.
CJS57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 05:28 PM   #16
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,531 Times in 788 Posts
Default

This pistol looks to be 100% correct to me.
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 05:56 PM   #17
lugercollector
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I agree
lugercollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2014, 11:46 PM   #18
Geo99
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 400
Thanks: 102
Thanked 127 Times in 75 Posts
Default

CJS57 & dju -
Yes I am saying if you compare the first picture (post #4) with the newer picture (post #12), the first one looks like there is no blue down in the "trenches" but the newer pic looks much better. After seeing the newer picture of the barrel numbers, I'm inclined to agree with the last 2 posts and say it looks OK to me too. But as you say, only a hands on examination will tell for certain.

It is interesting that the halos show up so well in the one picture, must have had the perfect angle to pick it up with the flash.
__________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying nice doggie, until you can find a rock."
- Will Rogers
Geo99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Geo99 for your post:
Unread 01-02-2014, 02:11 AM   #19
sej-gun
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 99
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Geo99:
It is interesting that the halos show up so well in the one picture, must have had the perfect angle to pick it up with the flash.

All photos are taken without flash, but the photos in the first post was taken with an additional halogen lamp, so there is more light on these. Last Photos I had use "Makro" mode on the camera.
Hope that this gives the explanation for the different light conditions

CJS57
I think he is saying there should be blue in and at the bottom of the little miniature "trench" made by the number punch

Correkt!


Reg. Jes
sej-gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-02-2014, 01:54 PM   #20
sej-gun
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 99
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Following the posts in this thread, I have a few questions
Are there only these 3 barrel stampings "Bö" "Bö.30" "Bö.32"?
Have you any idea about how many guns that have this stamping "Bö" Bö.30 "" Bö.32 ", out of the total production from DWM in 1913 and 1914?
Do you think that a gun with these stamping is a rarity and thus has a higher value than those who not have this stamping? (personally I see for example a regimental stamping as something really attractive)

I hope some of you will share your opinion about this barrel stamping

Reg. Jes
sej-gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com