Why so many non-matching mags?

[Curly1]

Why are there so many non-matching mags with Lugers and a lot of other WWII handguns? I would have assumed if it was a bring back they would have the correct mags.

Where the guys in the trenches required to turn in the mags for the trip home and then just get issued whatever was in the pile when they disembarked?
This I can understand as some knuckle head would eventually end up having a ND aboard ship.

Are matching ones officer bring backs who didn't have to turn in their mags?

Where they mixed up in the armory during the war?

Or have the majority been brought in after the war by importers prior to the mandatory importer desecration markings act and who knows what they did with them before they hit the streets?

All of the above?

Or does this fall in the category of "Why are we here?"

I have wondered about this for some time.

[Ron Wood]

If I were to venture a guess, I would think that a German soldier in combat wouldn't give a darn about what some collector of a century later and half a world away considered collectable...I would just be content to have a full magazine of ammo, whether it came from my buddy, the armorer or a fallen comrade.

[Fazer]

This maybe just a story. But I was told that when going into a mess or something like that, Not battle conditions, One had to disarm their side arm. This was done by taking the magazine out and putting it into a holding bin. When they left they would just grab a magazine to suit.

Probably BS, but who knows. The person that told me was no expert.

[jussi16]

I read somewhere that when the german soldiers surrendered, they had to remove the mags from the pistols.
And after that they were mixed up.
I guess that is why there are some pistols with matching "+" magazine in the holster but not in the gun.

jussi

[Patronen]

My hypothesis, from what I have put together, it tends to be with the case with Lugers for example is that weapons (Documented) captured off the enemy person directly had matching mags more of the time than just one found or brought home. Like others said before, upon mass surrender, guns in one pile and mags in another.
Now go on the otherside of the world to Japan, it seems (at least to me) that there are more Nambu type pistols around with matching mags and it's been said because the Japanese just fought to death or committed suicide rather than surrender.

[Edward Tinker]

This has been discussed before, but I could not find it

Anyway, all is conjecture, with several older members having witnessed #1 or heard it from stories, plus I have read it and seen a picture somewhere.

#1 - GI's when surrendering en-mass would take their holster off, and drop the pistol, magazines and holsters into separate piles or barrels.

#2a - As Ron said, in battle magazines were mixed up. In several luger books this is discussed, although I assume it is conjecture; that GI's just wanted mags that worked, not caring if they matched. Now, an armorer would match mags up when he had a chance and sometimes mark them or remark them / when he had time.

#2b - When taken off of police, they are more likely to be matched, I have seen more 'correct' police matched rigs than army

#3 - in the evening, cleaning guns or under fire but guns were dirty (trench warfare, WW1 esp) would not care if things got mixed up

#4 - US GI's probably could care less, as USA guns were not numbered like German ones were...

#5 - Items imported would not be matched and although they might have been matched at first in germany, once in a importers control, they just matched them up

Ed

[FNorm]

From this forum previously:

[Curly1]

Thanx for the interesting responses.

[tharpo]

Since the second magazine was in the holster, to have a luger with 2 correct matching magazines is even rarer. If the gun was captured without the holster, or the holster was seperated later, the second magazine would be long gone.

Tom

[Norme]

I've taken another look at the well known photo posted by Fred (FNorm), above, and the Lugers quite clearly still have their magazines. There goes the "guns in one pile, mags in another theory". Regards, Norm

[pitsword]

Appears to me to be a major breach of military procedure. Those mags were numbered to the pistol for a reason and knowing our Teutonic warriors, I doubt that they, UNLESS in a serious "fistacuffs", would show up for parade with a mismatched rig. Just does not seem reasonable. I believe that every effort would have been made to keep things matched. Agreed that after they surrendered the weapons to "not quite ready for prime time collectors" most of the mismatching happened. Used to be just my $.02, now my one dollar $3.98.

[Edward Tinker]

Originally Posted by Norme

I've taken another look at the well known photo posted by Fred (FNorm), above, and the Lugers quite clearly still have their magazines. There goes the "guns in one pile, mags in another theory". Regards, Norm

I disagree, since guns were handed over to officers, NCO's, taken off the battlefield, turned in by families during the amnesty, etc

I believe it was a mixture of many things that caused the above, one picture of a US GI arms room doesn't prove anything


Ed

[Edward Tinker]

Originally Posted by pitsword

Appears to me to be a major breach of military procedure. Those mags were numbered to the pistol for a reason and knowing our Teutonic warriors, I doubt that they, UNLESS in a serious "fistacuffs", would show up for parade with a mismatched rig. ...

War time is much different than peacetime

This year I saw M4's and M9's (M16 carbines and the 9mm pistol) carried in 20 different ways and in many, many conditions (used, abused and pristine), I assume all were working fine, but GI's carried them everywhere in Iraq, chow, latrine, even the gym.

Back in the 'real-world' they would be carried on the hip and cleaned and if finish was missing, then they would be fixed (unless at a training fort)


Ed

[Norme]

To shift this discussion somewhat to my own area of interest, Imperial Navy Lugers, which have an even lower rate of matched mags than Army, particularly when one considers that each gun was issued with three, not two, numbered mags. My theory is as follows: Most of the world's Navies kept, and still keep, their small arms under lock and key (probably because of that nasty business with H.M.S Bounty). In the case of the Imperial Navy this would have meant that the guns were locked in a rack or case, while the rest of the rig, with two of the mags, would most likely have been hung on a hook or stuffed in a cubby. When a landing or boarding party was formed, an officer would have unlocked the guns and the men would have grabbed a gun and rig without regard to matching numbers. It wouldn't take long before guns, stocks and mags were well and truly mixed. Remember, it's just a theory. Regards, Norm

[Don M]

I think the fact that more police Lugers have matching mags than Army suggests that much of the mismatching occurred before capture since police and Army weapons were probably treated much the same after capture.

[rolandtg]

Originally Posted by Fazer

This maybe just a story. But I was told that when going into a mess or something like that, Not battle conditions, One had to disarm their side arm. This was done by taking the magazine out and putting it into a holding bin. When they left they would just grab a magazine to suit.

Probably BS, but who knows. The person that told me was no expert.

I was told this same story back in the 1970's by a man who had picked up a Luger while stationed in Germany in the '50's.
Although, his Luger had at least one matching magazine.

[lugerholsterrepair]

I've taken another look at the well known photo posted by Fred (FNorm), above, and the Lugers quite clearly still have their magazines. There goes the "guns in one pile, mags in another theory". Regards, Norm


Norm, There is another well known photo of a long line of German Soldiers surrendering and that is exactly what they are doing..throwing a pistol in one pile and magazines in another. So that procedure is well documented.

I would guess by the time pistols ended up in storage bins magazines had been re inserted helter skelter.

[Norme]

Hi Jerry, We'll probably never know the truth, and you may well be right. However, if I was supervising the surrender and disarmament of prisoners, I'd have them drop their gun belts. If their pants fell down, too bad. The last thing I'd want is an "enemy combatant" fiddling around with a loaded pistol just a few feet away from me. Best regards, Norm

[lugerholsterrepair]

The last thing I'd want is an "enemy combatant" fiddling around with a loaded pistol just a few feet away from me.

Norm..A different day and age..If you study the history of WW2 ...by the time hundreds of thousands of German Soldiers were surrendering they had but one intention..to get home to their families and what might be left of Germany. They had known for months if not longer the war was a lost cause. Most if not all were delighted to be able to surrender to Allied/US forces.
These Soldiers were fiddling around with their sidearms for many years as seasoned combat veterans. I would have to bet they knew what they were doing and held no animosity towards Allied Soldiers.

[Norme]

Hi Jerry, It was widely known by US troops that there were at least two incidents of surrendering GIs being machine gunned by the Germans, towards the end of the war during the Ardennes offensive (Battle of the Bulge). I doubt that, when it came time for the Germans to surrender, the victorious GIs would have been as trusting as you make them out to be. All the best, Norm