![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Admittedly, my knowledge of Lugers is limited, but this one to me seems unusual. Most of the markings I've not seen before. The gun is a Finnish M23 with the 9mm Tikka replacement barrel. Most of the receiver group matches itself, and most of the barrel extension and toggle group matches each other, but both halves of the pistol are toatlly mis-matched to each other, which I guess is common on these Finns. I know this Luger came straight from Finland to me through a Canadian Dealer and it was still in heavy Finnish storage oil when I got it last week.
So please, someone help me decypher this one's past! Here you can see that the receiver ring doesn't seem to be out of round (unless I'm just not looking at it properly?) - yet there is no barrel extension date stamp...? That isn't really rus on the bbl - it's storage grease combined with a bright camera flash... And this is odd... notice that there seems to be an old detent in the middle of the Gesichert marking - ??? The mis-matched wood mag it came with - it's stamped with a "+", so I assume it was once a spare mag. Here are some faint proof marks that are partially buffed off, but they look like Imperial Army to me - might be an Erfurt eagle on the end, next pic I blew them up and increased the contrast. Here are the bbl extension markings - anyone seen this before? Obviously the SA is Finland, but what's with the Star over the C and the flaming bomb proof? Anybody? The toggle appears to be a DWM commercial because the serials are all hidden instead of out in the open and the proofs are crowns over an "N" Lastly, another shot of the top of the bbl extension - Erfurt? ex-artillery? You tell me! If anyone would like additional pics, let me know. Also, I forgot to take a pic of it, but the frame serial number is "1870 L" with the L in small-case cursive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: louisville ky
Posts: 277
Thanks: 31
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
Claven:
The cut on the top front of the receiver indicates it might have had an artillery barrel at one time. Regard Ken D |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi Ken,
Yes, I knew about that aspect of it, however, if the barrel extension is off an Erfurt made between 1914 and 1918, it could be either an artillery OR a normal P08. From what I can make out of the buffed military proofs, I think the extension WAS made between '14 and '18. Possibly a salvaged part re-used later on by DWM when they were making 1920's commercial guns - but I'm no expert. I do know the Finns bought commercial Lugers from 1923 onward, mostly from DWM (and later from Mauser) in .30 Luger - I suspect these were just normal Weimar commercials, but stand to be corrected. When the Finns rebuilt these to 9mm (not sure when), most got their parts mix-matched as the Finns tried to build the nicest working Lugers possible with the limited supply of well-used Lugers on hand. The parts were then refurbished and built in to pretty nice guns. Just wish I could nail down better what the markings on it mean. These Finns tell interesting stories IMHO, especially give the possible origins of the various parts. Does anyone know if Erfurt salvaged parts would have been used by DWM when they refurbished the Weimar Lugers and built up the 1920's commercials? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,119
Thanked 5,286 Times in 1,728 Posts
|
That is quite a "story book" Luger you have there! It spent some time in Belgium, which is the origin of the odd marks on the receiver. The bomb with the flames and fancy script "L" is a Belgian proof for guns of foreign make. The star over the "C" is a Belgian inspector's mark.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
According to the markings here:
http://www.lugerforum.com/lugermarkings/proof-2.html It would seem that the proofs on my barrel extension (right side) indicate "15. German military receiver proof. Found on DWM Lugers 1914-1918." So I guess it's likely na ex-artillery barrel extension maybe recycled by DWM for the 1920's Finnish contract M23 Lugers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hmm... the plot thickens... so the barrel extension was an artillery luger that somehow got to Belgium and was proofed there, then came back to DWM to be incorporated into commercial production, where it got sent to Finnland to be part of the M23 program...???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,119
Thanked 5,286 Times in 1,728 Posts
|
If I were to take a wild guess, I would think it was a DWM artillery that found its way to Belgium, and then the Finns picked it up in a parts scrounge and made a M23 out of it.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hmm... interesting. Did many DWM artillery Lugers go to Belgium? What can you tell me about the frame? Serial number 1870L? Also with that weird detent near the safety?
Has anyone else here seen a Finn like this one before? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
|
The partially buffed-out Eagle on the right receiver is clearly an Erfurt power-proof. That being the case, the receiver could be any year 1915-18, as all Erfurt receivers were cut with the Artillery sight notch. The "weird detent" could be a hardness test.
--Dwight |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Are you sure it's an Erfurt proof? I can't find reference to it anywhere except for symbol 15 above - and that's a DWM proof. ????
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The Finnish model designation for your pistol ( 9mm ) is M/08. The Finnsih Lugers chambered in the original 30 cal and designated M23. The grips that the Luger is wearing are standard Finnish replacements. Nice piece of history.
Last edited by Alsky; 01-28-2005 at 02:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,156
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,309 Times in 1,098 Posts
|
Are you sure those grips are standard Finnish replacements? They look like the inexpensive BLACK WIDOW reproduction grips that have sold for $12-20 in the last couple of years...
__________________
regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I will try to take some pics of the inside and outside of some of the Finnish replacement grips this weekend and post them here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The attached link will go to pictures of one of my Finnish Lugers with this type of grips. The link will go to a post on another board ( I hope that this is ok ! )This one came to me along with a few other Finnish lugers two years ago. Century Arms received a lot of 20 Lugers from Finland and this one was included in the group. I also was fortunate enough to have added 4 to my collection from this import that have the round brass unit disk still intact in the right grip panel. In addition to the luger pictured in the link above I think that I have two or three other Finn Lugers with the same replacement grip. The others have all come to me from the four winds. I have also seen pictures of a few other Finn Lugers with this type of grip.
http://www.gunboards.com/luger/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1341 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yes, these are ABSOLUTELY Finn grips. The Luger was purchased from Collector's Source in Canada. About two years ago they got a crate of these Lugers and maybe 1/3rd of them had the black grips, 1/3 had normal wood grips, and the last third had wood grips inletted for the removed unit disks.
When I disassembled the Luger for the first time, the whole gun was filled with the same type of Lubricant I found on my Finn Mosins, kind of a yellow-ish green storage oil. It was smeared into the grips too and I'd say these grips have been on this gun a long while. There's wear along the grips edges to suggest they some some military use at some point before being put to store. Additionelly, they seem to have been fitted to this Luger, because the rear of the grips is covered in small swirls, as though a milling machine had machined the back to create the raised areas that synch with the frame. I don't think they're German "Black Widdow" grips, but they are Finnish issue grips, probably made in Finland. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hmm... I thought the M/08 Lugers were only the ones with the standard 4" barrel? This Luger has a 4,3/4" barrel. I know the M23 contract Lugers were originally in .30 Luger, but from what I've seen/heard, at some point, the decision was made that all Lugers going through refurb from this point onward (not sure when) are going to become 9mm's, and that's when these longer barrels were used - supposedly so that they would better approximate the feel of the Lahti pistols then comming into service.
Do you know the exact progression here? M/23, then M/08's and M/23's concurrently, then the long barelled 9mm's? Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Claven
The Tikka replacement barrels were made in at least two different lengths and I have Tikkas in both 9mm and 30cal. Some of the M/08 pistols were brought to Finland by the Finnish "Jaeger" division ( trained in Germany form 1915-1918) and used in their war of independence in 1918. A few more M/08 pistols were purchased from Belgium during the Winter War 1939-40. During the war years and after the wars some more of the M23's along with other P/08s that had been acquired ( some from civilian population ) had their barrels replaced with Tikka barrels in both calibers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
So then given the Belgian proofs on my barrel extension, it's a fair bet that at least that part of my Luger came by way Belgium in the 1939-40 timeframe?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|