LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-04-2015, 05:57 PM   #1
garyed50
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default What was the point of the Artillery Luger?

Hey all Newbie here

I don't understand what any benefit was gained from the longer barrel?

Gary
garyed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-04-2015, 06:24 PM   #2
rhuff
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
rhuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,305
Thanks: 2,735
Thanked 991 Times in 727 Posts
Default

It is my understanding that with the long bbl. and a shoulder stock attached, one had a short bbl rifle that was more accurate and functional at distance than a 4in bbl. handgun. The whole unit could be broken down for easy storage/carrying, and then assembled quickly when needed. To me, it was between a service rifle and a handgun that was developed for certain personnel.
rhuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-04-2015, 06:57 PM   #3
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,960
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 4,592 Times in 2,114 Posts
Default

A 8 inch luger shoots a lot easier than a 4 inch, I can hit a lot more with it
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post:
Unread 05-04-2015, 08:11 PM   #4
Arizona Slim
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Arizona Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 706
Thanks: 1,026
Thanked 409 Times in 225 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Tinker View Post
A 8 inch luger shoots a lot easier than a 4 inch, I can hit a lot more with it

I agree completely Ed, I had just gotten out of the service when I purchased my first Luger, a 1917 Artillery and I was amazed at the accuracy of that pistol. While in the Military I had easy access to as much ammo as I wanted in everything from .22LR to .45, 12 gauge, .30 carbine, 30-06 and 7.62 Nato so would go out shooting at every opportunity. I had a collection of firearms that were chambered in all those calibers so really had a blast but never had anything to compare to that Luger.

Lon
Arizona Slim is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Arizona Slim for your post:
Unread 05-04-2015, 08:48 PM   #5
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 749
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 629 Times in 339 Posts
Default

Yep, it should be pretty obvious, the longer barrel allows for better accuracy, particularly at longer ranges. Most Lugers are tested on a 50 meter range, but the artillery was designed to shoot further with more accuracy. That's why it has the optional shoulder board extension. The navy versions usually had a longer barrel, too.

I also have a 1917 artillery for a shooter. It's so natural to point, aim and shoot.

I used to shoot a 4" colt python, which was fairly accurate at 25 and 25 yards. When I tried out a 6" trooper, I could shoot the pattern at 50 yards with the same ammo. That's how I earned my marksman qualification, when I was in the service. The length of the barrel just makes it easier to to hit your target.
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post:
Unread 05-04-2015, 09:53 PM   #6
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,919
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,518 Posts
Default

Longer sight radius and slightly higher muzzle velocity...

The short barrel rifle was more appropriate for ground troops guarding artillery installations.

Less than a carbine... more than a pistol.
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to mrerick for your post:
Unread 05-04-2015, 10:12 PM   #7
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

The LP08 was designed to serve instead of carbines for point defence use by machine gun and artillery support troops for whom a carbine might prove to be cumbersome or awkward during the performance of their duties. It also proved to be effective as a light assault weapon in the hands of sturmtruppen (storm troopers) when coupled with 32-round snail drum magazines.

And yes, when used with a board stock it is accurate as all heck at ridiculously long range. They are even startlingly accurate even without the stock. One of the reasons for this accuracy is a rear sight which biases itself horizontally as you raise it for increased range, to compensate for the gyroscopically curved path of the bullet.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Dwight Gruber for your post:
Unread 05-04-2015, 10:52 PM   #8
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,138 Times in 2,176 Posts
Default

As pointed out by Dwight, you can attach a snail drum, adjust the sight and increase your capacity from 8 to 32!!!!! A bid advantage and very deadly!!! Eric~
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2015, 01:43 AM   #9
MikeP
User
 
MikeP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ILL
Posts: 686
Thanks: 36
Thanked 452 Times in 198 Posts
Default

Ii must be getting old.
The substitute carbine angle for engineer and artillery NCOs and others and adaption for trench sweeping used to be basic required knowledge for Luger enthusiasts.
MikeP is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2015, 08:15 AM   #10
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 749
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 629 Times in 339 Posts
Default

OK I have question about the snail drum.
Did it only work on artillery Lugers ? Is there a special link or fitting ?
Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2015, 08:45 AM   #11
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,919
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,518 Posts
Default

It should work on all of them. Balance may be more the issue.
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2015, 08:47 AM   #12
Ice
User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 552
Thanks: 13
Thanked 69 Times in 57 Posts
Default

The snail drum wiill fit and function in all Lugers

Charlie.
Ice is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2015, 09:20 AM   #13
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

It does, however, require a specialized loading tool.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2015, 11:25 AM   #14
danielsand
User
 
danielsand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 137
Thanks: 52
Thanked 100 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Artillery crews have their hands full, every time the crew changes position. Not to mention the operation (loading, aiming, firing, cleaning) of the weapons during (or after) the barrage. In the battle scenarios they are often protected by machine gun crews, but that's not always possible. Having a full size battle rifle (K98 or such) for personal protection can be very cumbersome, and get in the way of artillery crew's performance.

If they are issued with only 4" pistols, they are very vulnerable to attack by the enemy infantry that can pick them off from the range not reachable by the handgun. And that's where LP08 came into play. It allowed the crew to defend itself out to the greater distance, and offered easily transported, and maneuverable "short rifle" (carbine), with even greater capacity (with the snail drum) than the battle rifle of the time.

This concept has to be viewed in the historical setting of the "Great War" (WW1), where intermediate range automatic weapons (submachineguns) didn't exist yet. In the way,......"Artillery Lugers" were "submachineguns" of their time. Add to that the "Schnellfeuer", and you can clearly see where the tactical development thinking was heading. With the adoption of MP40 (and much earlier than that!), this artillery crew protection tool went down in history.

Some "old school" officers even had them during the invasion of Poland (September 1939), as a "status symbol" of sort, much like some ranking officers still carried the sabers in the Great War. Artillery Luger is a fascinating piece, and the first weapon I ever laid my hands on as a toddler. My Mother brought one from the war, and as a toddler I was allowed to play on the couch with it (unloaded of course). And since I was born ten years after the Second War, political correctness didn't prevent me from developing a healthy fascination toward ALL historical weapons, and history in general.
danielsand is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to danielsand for your post:
Unread 05-05-2015, 12:15 PM   #15
garyed50
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

thanks Everyone



Gary
garyed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-09-2015, 11:40 AM   #16
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,195
Thanks: 1,413
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyed50 View Post
I don't understand what any benefit was gained from the longer barrel?
When I first read of an "artillery Luger", I immediately thought of the platform vehicle that my class in Schools Battalion trained on [briefly] in 1970. It mounted a 106mm recoiless rifle, and had a co-axially mounted single-shot 50 cal spotter rifle. It was called an M274 'Mule'. The 50 cal spotter rifle was used to target the recoiless rifle. This was what popped into my head when I heard 'artillery Luger'.

I thought maybe the 'artillery Luger' was used to spot artillery fire.

Obviously a false assumption, but the Mule was a cool vehicle. The steering column unclamped and could be swiveled in a 360º arc.

We had an instructor demonstrate this by un-clamping the column, lying on the ground, and letting the vehicle drag him around in a figure-eight while he steered it from the prone position...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	106Mule_2.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	65.2 KB
ID:	49515  

__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-09-2015, 11:52 AM   #17
Don M
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Don M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
Default

I'm surprised no one has mentioned use of the LP08 by aircrews to take pot shots at each other. I thought that was one of its main uses.
__________________
Regards,
Don
donmaus1@aol.com

Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936
http://www.historywritinsteel.com
Don M is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-09-2015, 12:09 PM   #18
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don M View Post
I'm surprised no one has mentioned use of the LP08 by aircrews to take pot shots at each other. I thought that was one of its main uses.
Because it wasn't. By middle 1915 the Germans were already firing a machine gun through the propeller arc.
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-09-2015, 12:48 PM   #19
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,195
Thanks: 1,413
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don M View Post
I'm surprised no one has mentioned use of the LP08 by aircrews to take pot shots at each other. I thought that was one of its main uses.
I thought that was one of the great surprise endings to the movie "Flyboys", when the German 'Falcon' draws his finger across his throat, and the American pilot shoots him with his French revolver...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-09-2015, 04:30 PM   #20
Don M
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Don M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,429
Thanks: 67
Thanked 292 Times in 191 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurusu View Post
Because it wasn't. By middle 1915 the Germans were already firing a machine gun through the propeller arc.
Guess I'd better stick with the police!
__________________
Regards,
Don
donmaus1@aol.com

Author of History Writ in Steel: German Police Markings 1900-1936
http://www.historywritinsteel.com
Don M is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com