LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-24-2013, 04:25 PM   #1
garandguy56
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default S/42 1938 Purchase Decision

Hello all,

Looking to buy this Luger for $2500. It is all matching and has one matching mag (one mismatch included as well). What do you all think?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pix092523316.jpg (64.6 KB, 118 views)
File Type: jpg pix461943690.jpg (69.0 KB, 121 views)
File Type: jpg pix428183054.jpg (40.1 KB, 109 views)
File Type: jpg pix566351659.jpg (56.2 KB, 110 views)
File Type: jpg pix575428053.jpg (61.3 KB, 108 views)
File Type: jpg pix727671757.jpg (56.6 KB, 119 views)
garandguy56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-24-2013, 06:08 PM   #2
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

I, for one, think that some much better photos are in order to determine if it is reblued.
Have you checked all the internals for matching numbers including the toggle pin and the inside numbers on the side plate?
$2500 is a last-man-out price and it had all better be right.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-24-2013, 08:21 PM   #3
Arizona Slim
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Arizona Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 706
Thanks: 1,026
Thanked 409 Times in 225 Posts
Default

First let me welcome you to the forum it's good to have you as a member.
I agree with David completely, more photos at all angles are a must. Is the condition of the grips and bore commensurate with the condition of the outside of this pistol? It appears to be in almost mint condition therefor the bore and grips should also be nearly mint, assuming the grips are original. That price is at the very top of the scale so it would be a shame to find out after the fact that it has been re-blued or otherwise refurbished.

Lon
Arizona Slim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-24-2013, 08:41 PM   #4
garandguy56
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Thanks David and Ron! I've asked the seller for additional pictures on the outside but he says the bore has some light pitting and frosting. Grips are also matching.
garandguy56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 07:09 AM   #5
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,087
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

It's very, very difficult to find a P.08 in those almost "mint conditions". Check it well; I agree with Arizona Slim, price seems to be at the very top of the scale so it would be a shame to find out that somehow it got refurbished somewhere.
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 07:43 AM   #6
lfid
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wichita, KS USA
Posts: 453
Thanks: 573
Thanked 96 Times in 53 Posts
Default

the most suspicious area visible is in picture 2 - the right side upper rear frame area which is bordered by the recoil rail that begins near the toggle and has sort of a cursive "n" shape.
it is right side similiar area that on the other side left side has the the safety lever and gesichert text

the right side picture shows it with an irregular reddish tint - which salt reblued lugers sometimes have due to temperature variations versus the steel hardness - I dont recall any discussion cases of this redness thing on original mausers

right receiver near the barrel mount - the small fillet area that blends the receiver ring profile with the side flat looks soft like some reblued cases and receiver looks like sanded not machined surface

at this price level bore must be like new shiny etc

patience and better pictures and good luck in the quest !!!
Bill
lfid is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 12:14 PM   #7
garandguy56
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Additional pictures:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00004.jpg (118.4 KB, 94 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00001.jpg (91.4 KB, 82 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00006.jpg (95.2 KB, 95 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00007.jpg (74.8 KB, 97 views)
garandguy56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 12:39 PM   #8
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

Flats look flat and sharp edges look sharp...If refinished, they did it right.

Price seems high...But only to me...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 12:52 PM   #9
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

lfid wrote: "the right side picture shows it with an irregular reddish tint - which salt re-blued Lugers sometimes have due to temperature variations versus the steel hardness - I dont recall any discussion cases of this redness thing on original mausers "

The year 1938 seems to be a year when there was a lapse of quality control in the bluing process. We frequently see a "plummish color" especially on the receiver in both Mauser and Krieghoff P.08s produced in that year. Additionally, one can find the occasional Krieghoff commercial or side frame inscription, produced on 1939 from excess or rejected parts that exhibit this plum color.

Now having said that, the plum color can also be seen on poorly re-blued guns of all dates. So, as always be careful and look for multiple pieces of evidence to support any conclusion you may wish to draw.

It has been surmised on both forums and in some published literature, that either the control of temperature (too low) or an over dilution/over use of salts was the cause of the plum hue.

Hope this helps.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 01:18 PM   #10
alvin
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
Default

The gun itself is probably OK. But the magazine bottom is too shiny on the picture. One common play on this -- people re-number the magazine to make it match, buyer cannot be more careful on this practice. Especially when the magazine is counted in value big time.
alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 01:18 PM   #11
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,925
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,139 Times in 1,520 Posts
Default

I believe that the steel alloy content can also influence the plum color bluing.

Is the number inside the trigger plate a "86" or "87"?

Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 03:24 PM   #12
ithacaartist
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
ithacaartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,400
Thanks: 7,555
Thanked 2,643 Times in 1,393 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrerick View Post
I believe that the steel alloy content can also influence the plum color bluing.

Is the number inside the trigger plate a "86" or "87"?

Marc
I think it's "38"--which is the last two serial # digits. But wait! Is this the particular kind of Mauser that's supposed to be one digit off the last two, stamped inside the side plate?
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894
ithacaartist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 03:59 PM   #13
garandguy56
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

According to the seller the number is "86"
garandguy56 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to garandguy56 for your post:
Unread 08-25-2013, 06:07 PM   #14
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

86? Red flag...
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 06:08 PM   #15
garandguy56
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

86 on one side and 38 and on the other (8638 Serial)
garandguy56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 07:21 PM   #16
lugersrkewl
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ussr
Posts: 425
Thanks: 198
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
Default

that is correct if I remember one of the experts right. they did that so as not to mix up parts with same last digits?
lugersrkewl is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 07:35 PM   #17
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garandguy56 View Post
86 on one side and 38 and on the other (8638 Serial)
That is the correct numbering format. By 1938, there was either the first two digits, or the first two digits plus one on the inside. 86 or 87. Either is correct.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to guns3545 for your post:
Unread 08-25-2013, 07:37 PM   #18
garandguy56
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

So what do we all think? It's $2500 and a bit high but the condition is pretty impressive and every website (dealer or classified ad sites like gunbroker and Guns America) has these going for $2500 and up.
garandguy56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2013, 08:27 PM   #19
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
Default

Hi Ray, This gun looks very nice indeed, I doubt that you can find a better one. The price of $2,500.00 is not unfair in my opinion.
Regards, Norm
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Norme for your post:
Unread 08-25-2013, 09:13 PM   #20
garandguy56
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 55
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone! Your input has been EXTREMELY helpful! Definitely a great group of members here
garandguy56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com