![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
New User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
As all of you Luger afficionados have no doubt noticed, the Luger has a semi circular trigger that is quite different in appearance than the 1911a1 and, say, the Browning High Power (aka P-35). My question is: Can anyone tell me the reasons behind the adoption of this particular trigger shape?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
![]()
It looked cute.
![]() Apart from that, it's a bit of a form follows function issue that also tied in with the design 'fashion' of those days. The luger pistol has a lot of design features that can be attributed to the Jugendstil / Art Deco style of those days. What also influence the design of several luger parts was the request by DWM to Georg Luger to keep as much of the Borchardt design as possible, in order to reduce the cost for retooling. |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Vlim for your post: |
![]() |
#3 |
New User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Interesting..... I would have figured the French would have been more inclined to incorporate such "fashion" into their little "fu fu"pistols.
![]() I found it strange on the Luger since it appears to allow the trigger finger to "reset" the trigger if it failed to do so on its own... but seeing as the Luger has no "second strike" capability it would seem to be a useless attribute in those regards. Unless..... due to the tight nature of the pistol and its disdain for dust and debris, it was thought to help move the trigger back and forth and hopefully knock free any trapped battlefield "gunk." I can see the Germans thinking in this respect.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethtown, KY
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
French had no need of fashion weapons, they were only intended to be dropped once. I heard the Chauchat did make an excellent still though.
![]() Frank |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,195
Thanks: 1,411
Thanked 4,462 Times in 2,336 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I know, that is close to heresy in this Forum... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
![]()
You are not far from the truth. Luger wasn't a design genius. He was a patenting genius. There is a difference
![]() Paul Mauser, Isidor Loewe and Paul von Gontard thought he was a bit of an **shole, and although he remained on friendly terms with Hugo Borchardt, they had their fair share of professional disputes as well. The reason that he died broke was mainly his own fault. He made too many enemies in the wrong places so when there was a chance to get rid of him, they did kick him out of the company. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
![]()
How is Luger's coil type main spring? The structure looks very creative.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,035
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,241 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
![]()
Who did what in the coil mainspring design is not completely clear, but the Dutch had a hand in it. Whether they actually created the working design or merely stated a requirement and left the implementation to DWM is not, to my knowledge, a matter of record.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
![]() |
|
|