![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
These mags came with my new byf 41. According to what info I have been able to find using the search feature, either one or both could be correct for the gun. You will notice that the aluminum base mag does not have the PO8 stamp although, it does have the 122/eagle/37 stamp....as does the other mag. Can anyone help with this? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 737 Times in 484 Posts
|
DH, Your 122 code mag is more likely late 1939 or 1940 prduction, but the BPB/FXO is absolutely correct as the spare mag. TH
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi dhusker,
If you'd like to have a second fxo mag for your byf41 see my post with photos under "Want To Buy" I have two very nice fxo mags w/black plastic bottoms that are correct for your pistol and I desperately need a nice 122-se37 like the one you have. The 122 code is not a correct mag for your byf41 but it is a correct mag for my 42/1940 Mauser Military. If interested you could email me at: westgate44@aol.com Thanks very much, Jerry L. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|