LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-23-2006, 09:15 AM   #1
Tom Whiteman
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 33 Times in 4 Posts
Default 1902 Fat Barrell Luger

Is it possible that this one is correct??

http://www.rockislandauction.com/auc...hp?LotNum=1790
Tom Whiteman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-23-2006, 09:23 AM   #2
drbuster
User
 
drbuster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Tom, it "looks" correct and original, but of course we all know that Mauser was NOT the manufacturer.
drbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-23-2006, 09:29 AM   #3
tudorbug
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 387
Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 29 Posts
Default

There are two "fat barrell" lugers, the above noted by Tom, and this American Eagle fat barrell:

http://www.rockislandauction.com/auc...hp?LotNum=1791

They are lot numbers 1790 and 1791.

David
tudorbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-23-2006, 10:24 AM   #4
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,966
Thanks: 2,066
Thanked 4,595 Times in 2,116 Posts
Default

an incredible amount of "professionally restored guns" on this auction, again...
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-24-2006, 09:11 AM   #5
drbuster
User
 
drbuster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Ed, Neither of the explanations for the 1902 fat barrels say that any restoration has been done, but it would help to see for yourself.
drbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-24-2006, 09:13 AM   #6
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,966
Thanks: 2,066
Thanked 4,595 Times in 2,116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by drbuster
Ed, Neither of the explanations for the 1902 fat barrels say that any restoration has been done, but it would help to see for yourself.
You are correct, I just meant in the auction themselves for "lugers"...
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-04-2006, 12:20 PM   #7
Steinar
User
 
Steinar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 18
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Default

..schmeisser barrels ground down to fit a Lugers, looks very much alike that barrel..
__________________
Previously known as Morgan Kane
Steinar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-04-2006, 01:56 PM   #8
Navy
RIP
 
Navy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Default

In general, RIA descriptions tend to be pretty accurate; they use words/phrases such as "assembled", "custom made", "replicates" when referring tomade up or boosted guns. I would tend to believe this one is legit based on the patina and wear pattern, but would not be willing to take that kind of bet with the bucks involved here unless i or someone I know and trust has seen the gun.

Tom A.
Navy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-04-2006, 03:05 PM   #9
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,040
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,256 Times in 1,724 Posts
Default

Both Lugers look pretty good, particularly the Commercial. If you have the bucks it might be worth a go...but with a no questions return after examining it. I agree with Tom A that RIA is getting a bit more cautious with their descriptions, and if a piece is a bit hinky they usually will hedge their wording.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2006, 01:12 PM   #10
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Does this sentence from the Commerical FB auction ad concern anyone ???

" The commercial proofs and bore diameter markings on the bottom of the barrel appear to be very faint, but the serial number looks correct and matches the pistol. "
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2006, 01:43 PM   #11
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,040
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,256 Times in 1,724 Posts
Default

Nope. For some reason, the BUG proofs on these Fat Barrels are struck very lightly. I have a mint AE FB, and FGS also had a mint one for sale. Both have -very- light barrel markings. The Commercial sounds pretty righteous to me.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com