![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]()
Charles Kenyon, in the latest Gun Report, has indicated that his upcoming article on the .45 caliber Luger will be his last and he will retire from the magazine. I really will miss these timely monthly "Luger at Random" articles. Does anyone know if the magazine has plans to have another recognized expert carry on the column?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,960
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 4,592 Times in 2,114 Posts
|
![]()
like doc Fisher! he should volunteer!
![]() ed
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]()
Flattered though I am by Ed's joking remark, I will NEVER posses the knowledge or experience to write such a prestigeous column!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,960
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 4,592 Times in 2,114 Posts
|
![]()
oh thats b^%%$#* Herb,
![]() Ed |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]()
Ed, I like your logic, but, alas, the rest of the Luger world will look aghast!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Would be nice if Kenyon used his last article to help collectors by writing about faked and boosted lugers and how to spot them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
|
![]()
Sure would, Pete!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|