LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Artillery Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-18-2007, 08:18 AM   #1
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,772
Thanked 2,527 Times in 786 Posts
Default Gunbroker LP08

An artillery worth discussion in an open forum...Gunbroker #75916264
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2007, 08:43 AM   #2
Steinar
User
 
Steinar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 18
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Perhaps the seller will sell a stamping tool kit once this deal is closed?
direct link
__________________
Previously known as Morgan Kane
Steinar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2007, 09:25 AM   #3
the gunman
User
 
the gunman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Leland NC 28451
Posts: 1,017
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

No feedback on this Clown either. Worst numbering job I've seen in a long time.
the gunman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2007, 09:30 AM   #4
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,772
Thanked 2,527 Times in 786 Posts
Default

I sent the seller a private message yesterday (very polite I might add) and told him his gun had alot of problems. He has not yet responded.
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2007, 01:27 PM   #5
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,890
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,282 Times in 424 Posts
Default

Nice c/N commercial toggle...

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2007, 11:09 PM   #6
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

A whole bunch of the "72" SN stampings do not look right, either...
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-18-2007, 11:38 PM   #7
DaveinTN
User
 
DaveinTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 186
Thanks: 3
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Default

OK, here's another gap in my knowledge....

I agree the numbers on this gun look unusual when compared to the many photos of other typically numbered pistols.

Here's my question: When a pistol is re-numbered like this one apparently is, would the original numbers be filled in with a welder, then ground flush and finally restamped and reblued?

Just curious,

Dave in TN.
DaveinTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-20-2007, 12:28 AM   #8
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Hi Dave,

There are boosting methods I have probably not even thought of...but...

1. I think TIG welding, resurfacing, restamping, and rebluing (or rebluing and then restamping if you want to create halos) would certainly account for some of the odd "72" number stamps on this gun.

2. This gun's trigger side plate may be from a commercial WWI era Luger (with its originsl 2-digit SN's along the bottom edge. Those bottom edge numbers can easily be removed with the contour of the bottom edge still looking okay. Then you have a blank front surface on the old commercial side plate on which to stamp 2-digits in the military style.

3. The extractor could be a modern-day Sarco-type part with new "72" added. I think the repro parts you get from such an outfit are not numbered.

4. Frequently you will see un-numbered Luger parts coming up on eBay. Probably original amourer replacement parts. It is curious to watch the eBay names of some of the "regular" folks that bid on those un-numbered parts... . Some buyers using cute eBay names to hide their ID's but some collectors know who they are and know they sell "minty & all matching" Lugers...out of the other end of their businesses...

I watched one of these "snakes" over a year or so on eBay buy many sets of old-world number metal-stamp sets...time and time again...many have the right size of the numbers and the old-world fonts one expects to see from DWM SN stampings on Lugers

The guy who did the "72" number stampings on this Luger under discussion obviously did not care to get the "look" of the added "72" even remotely looking correct and proper.

Not saying the seller was the booster...but the seller does probably know what is wrong and just wants to pass the gun on...

Such a "passing of a bad gun" even happens amongst a few collectors I know...
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com