![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL and PA
Posts: 332
Thanks: 276
Thanked 243 Times in 109 Posts
|
![]()
I shared some pictures of my new reproduction artillery holster/stock on the Firing Line and one of the Admins there raised a question about its legality attached to an Artillery Luger, saying that there was a period of time where the BATF considered it to be legal as-is, but that it has again reverted to SBR status in need of registration.
I have seen the 1981 letter implying legality of a repro holster without a stamp, but supposedly there is a newer letter leaning the other way. Does anyone have evidence for a definitive ruling on this that applies today? Last edited by spacecoast; 09-16-2016 at 03:15 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to spacecoast for your post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|