LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-26-2015, 02:13 AM   #1
Yukon Jack
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default Looking for more info. BYF 41 SN-3877

I am new to the Luger forum and also a new collector just getting started. I have recently acquired my first Luger and am looking for more information on it. I know a little bit about it assuming the information I have been told is correct. All serial numbers match except for the 2 mags. Picture quality may not be that good as all I have available at this time is my phone. I can get higher res. pics. later if necessary.
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2015, 03:14 AM   #2
gunnertwo
User
 
gunnertwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nampa, Idaho
Posts: 642
Thanks: 854
Thanked 957 Times in 373 Posts
Default

Buy this book, first. I know, you already bought your first P.08. This will tell you a mountain of info and is worth the price on the secondary market. It will save you money on future purchases. Place a want to buy on the collector forums, one may turn up at a reasonable price.

"The Mauser Parabellum 1930-1946, Analysis of a Million Luger Pistols"

Welcome to the collecting world!

G2
gunnertwo is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2015, 07:59 AM   #3
Bill_in_VA
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Bill_in_VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southwest Virginia
Posts: 406
Thanks: 816
Thanked 614 Times in 222 Posts
Default

I've got no connection to the seller other than being a satisfied customer, but Gunshowbooks.com has it in stock for $349 which is about as cheap as I've seen it in a while.
http://www.gunshowbooks.com/cgi-bin/...7&sid=NX6N7FeJ
HTH
__________________
John 8:32


reive (riːv) vb (Military) (intr) dialect Scot and Northern English to go on a plundering raid
[variant of reave]
ˈreiver n e.g., " Some view the Border Reivers as loveable rogues."
Bill_in_VA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2015, 09:03 AM   #4
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

YJ:
Get us some good photos and we'll tell you all that we can. Also, if you have specific questions, comments, gun history or doubts, be sure to add them.
Congratulations on your first Luger, and Welcome to the forum!
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2015, 10:20 AM   #5
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Jack,

First welcome to the Forum.

There is a lot of help here and its relatively easy to tap. But.. although I will not harangue you about buying books, I must tell you that photos are important, if not indispensable, to us providing assistance to you.

So.. your gun. Well, you know it is a Model P.08 military issue sidearm and in 1941 was standard issue to German Forces. It was made in Oberndorf at the Mauser facility.

Now as to serial number. Are you sure it is 3877?? Is there no scriptic suffix letter under the serial number on the front of the frame??

The serial number of a Model P.08 is made up of the number plus suffix or no suffix; and according to most purists the chamber date or code. That is the unique identifier for a model P.08. This is important because there were about 130,000 P.08s made in 1941, a little over 10,000 per month. If you gun has no suffix, it was made late in the year November to December time frame.

Also around the ns block of 10,000 guns the inspector changed from Eagle 655 Eagle 655 to Eagle 655 Eagle 135.

But you should know that there were about 11-12 other guns marked 41 byf that also used 3877 as the suffixes ranged from the o-block through the alphabet to the b-block.

So you can see that if we had pictures of the right side of the receiver and the front of the frame where the inspector proofs and serial number respectively are shown, it would answer a lot of questions about when the gun was made.

In any case, I hope this helps.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2015, 12:39 PM   #6
derf0018
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 35
Thanks: 372
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Default

guns3545:

The P.38 was standard issue in 1941
; the P.08 was substitute standard.

Fred
derf0018 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-26-2015, 01:40 PM   #7
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derf0018 View Post
guns3545:

The P.38 was standard issue in 1941
; the P.08 was substitute standard.

Fred
Fred,

Technically, maybe true. The order formally designating the P.38 as the service standard was signed on April 26, 1940 after the conclusion of the Fourth Variation Zero Series. But Formal Adoption and reality differ. In reality "what was standard" really depended on which branch and type unit.

In 1941, Walther was the only manufacturer actually delivering P.38s and had no where near the capacity to meet the Heereswaffenamt requirements given the decision to fight a multi-fronted war and the rise of Waffen SS units in addition to the Wehrmacht's, Navy's and Luftwaffe's needs, not to mention the Police. Just look at Walther's 1941 production numbers and the manufacturing shakedown that occurred in 1941.

But enough said. Too much time already spent on a subject really not at all relevant to the OP's question.

But if you want to start a discussion on service standards and their evolution, you can always start your own thread.


John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to guns3545 for your post:
Unread 05-26-2015, 02:38 PM   #8
derf0018
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 35
Thanks: 372
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Default

guns3545:

A good answer, and as you probably already know that only about 140,000 P.38's were mfg. in the 1940/41 period, not nearly enough to supply the German Armed Forces and many P.08's were issued.

Thank you

Fred
derf0018 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to derf0018 for your post:
Unread 05-27-2015, 03:28 AM   #9
Yukon Jack
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

Thank you all for the responses. I seem to be having a problem posting the pictures. I thought
I posted them but they obviously did not attach.
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 03:19 AM   #10
Yukon Jack
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default Pics.

ok, let's try this again. I think, hope, I have the pictures attached this time.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg L1.jpg (144.7 KB, 369 views)
File Type: jpg L2.jpg (145.9 KB, 360 views)
File Type: jpg L3.jpg (99.1 KB, 338 views)
File Type: jpg L4.jpg (150.5 KB, 365 views)
File Type: jpg L5.jpg (66.3 KB, 355 views)
File Type: jpg L6.jpg (122.8 KB, 353 views)
File Type: jpg L9.jpg (96.4 KB, 360 views)
File Type: jpg L7.jpg (82.8 KB, 331 views)
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 4 members says Thank You to Yukon Jack for your post:
Unread 05-28-2015, 08:42 AM   #11
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Jack:
Congratulations! As you know the photos lack clarity for close up exam and nit-picking, however it looks very nice from what I can see. And if you want to spike the collective blood pressure around here just refer to it as a "black widow" model.
Any specific questions?
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 09:07 AM   #12
K.Wilhelm
User
 
K.Wilhelm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Central Colorado
Posts: 215
Thanks: 45
Thanked 110 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Appears to be a nice, Mauser produced byf 41. Don't know if the grips are real or reproductions. The pistol has a letter suffix to the serial number, but I can't read it.
__________________
NRA Endowment Life member
Proud veteran of the Naval Security Group
K.Wilhelm is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 09:20 AM   #13
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukon Jack View Post
ok, let's try this again. I think, hope, I have the pictures attached this time.
Jack,

Nice looking P.08.

The serial number is 3877s, indicating that it was probably made in May of 1941 but that is only an approximation.

The vast majority of the s-block guns were allocated to the Army. Some went to the Airforce and a much lesser number to the Navy.

It probably left the factory with wood grip panels marked with an Eagle 655 stamp rather than the last two digits of the serial number. It was most likely equipped with two extruded blued body and a serialized aluminum based magazines with the spare magazine marked with a +.

Note that I have used the word probably a lot. The reason is that in the year 1941 several changes were made to the delivery spec.

In mid-year there were transitions to the Type 6 black plastic bottom magazine replacing type 4 and 5 magazines.

Also around mid-year, sporadically black plastic grip panels started to appear, replacing the walnut grip panels

Any combination of two or three different types of magazine and two types of grip panels are theoretically possible in this time frame.

You may also want to carefully examine the P.08 stamp on the right side of the frame. Is the punctuation mark between the P and the 08 square or round? This was another transition as the new marking standards came into play. The Heereswaffenamt wanted to make sure that personnel were clearly informed that this was a P.08 and not the new P.38.

Hope this helps.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to guns3545 for your post:
Unread 05-28-2015, 10:34 AM   #14
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,925
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,139 Times in 1,520 Posts
Default

If the magazines that came with your Luger are black bakelite based FXO magazines (E/37 WaffenAmt approval) they would be considered correct and matching for your pistol.

Try taking some pictures using a regular digital camera in natural light without the flash. It's easier to judge finish.

Congratulations, and welcome to the addiction!
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 11:09 AM   #15
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,087
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

For what can be seen from the pictures it looks like a fine gun, especially if it's all matching (except the mags)

Sergio
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 12:04 PM   #16
Yukon Jack
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default 3877

Thanks again for the replies. Grips are original according to the gunsmith that looked at it and he did refer to it as a black widow. Can't tell if the punctuation between the P and the 08 is square or round. I know it's a very long shot but if the mag(s) were out there somewhere I certainly would like to acquire them. Any information on the mags I do have would be appreciated. Also are there any references out there that might give detailed information about the gun I have? Branch it was issued to, who it was issued to, etc.?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg L10.jpg (141.2 KB, 345 views)
File Type: jpg L12.jpg (59.5 KB, 363 views)
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 01:18 PM   #17
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Some of the books guys MAY be able to tell you where the bulk of that block of guns went, but honestly those records are pretty scarce. Specifically who got your gun just ain't happenin'.
There is a magazine number list that you can put your numbers down on, and who knows? But it's a long shot.
It is my understanding that the black plastic UNNUMBERED late FXO mags. are also correct, so that is the way most collectors go on these latter guns.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 02:07 PM   #18
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Jack,

Thanks for the additional information and pictures.

Unfortunately it is difficult to say where this pistol was issued and used. Most information about provenance comes when a vet has brought it back and supplied information where and how it was captured. Generally speaking, guns that have seen combat are well worn and guns that have not, or have been assigned to non-front line units are in better shape. But these are only assumptions.

In the s-block, about 7400 guns went to the Army, 2400 to the Luftwaffe mainly for Air Defense and Paratroop Units. The Navy received the remaining 200 or so guns. THESE ARE ESTIMATES. There is no good way to know. We used to be able identify Navy guns by their unit markings but this practice was stopped in 1940.

Question: Are both magazines marked the same?. I cannot tell. The lower magazine is a Haenel made (that's code 122), accepted by the inspector located there, Eagle 37. From the serial number it was originally issued with a 1940 code 42 gun. Early byf guns would have been equipped with this magazine type but only to about the p-block. Later guns would have Haenel (code was changed to fxo in 1941), also inspected and accepted by Eagle 37.

The type 6, black plastic base magazines started to appear around mid-year.

Can't tell, but I doubt that the body of the magazine has an upside down P.08 stamped on it. The P.08 marking requirement only came into effect on January 1, 1941.

I don't need to tell you that finding even one matching magazine will be difficult. As I mentioned, this gun was manufactured when the transition from serial numbered to non-serial numbered magazines was occurring, so it is entirely possible that a fxo 37 magazine with an unmarked aluminum bottom would be the type issued originally with the gun. Still difficult to find plain bottom but infinitely easier than finding matching serials.

The fall back plan employed by many collectors would be: "Well it is theoretically possible that a Type 6 magazine would have been issued with the gun, (and besides it already has black plastic grip panels on it) so let me go and buy a couple magazines." This plan is eminently doable. All is takes is a few dollars and care to insure that you are buying an original fxo type 6 magazine. Counterfeits abound!!

Hope this helps.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to guns3545 for your post:
Unread 05-28-2015, 03:08 PM   #19
El Syd
User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 15
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Jack - beautiful luger. the finish looks great. is it original or has it been re-blued? I'm a newby as well, so hopefully I am not insulting you when I ask this question.

The guys on this forum really know their lugers and have helped me tremendously in my quest for a couple of lugers. Welcome to the forum, syd
El Syd is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2015, 05:30 PM   #20
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Syd:
I can't see anything that suggests re-blue, but either better photos or hands-on inspection would be necessary to be more certain. But there are certainly no signs of buffing.
I'd be pretty comfortable going with "original blue".
And "nice gun".
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com