![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 3,706 Times in 1,011 Posts
|
![]()
Hi to all, well, sometime it just doesn't pay to get up in the morning! But, while range testing my artillery I was beset bt a host of other problems, and the worst of it is, i don't know what is the cause?
It started with noticing a bump on the receiver right above the extractor relief, and then I noticed the RH side ot the extractor cut on the breech block had a bit of a rise to it? I immeadiatly checked the firing pin retainer area, and it was fine? The extractor itself showed some metal movement on the LH side stop. My first thought was ammo that was too strong, but I quickly dismissesd that because over powered ammo would affect other aspects of the luger and would have no mechanical change where the extractor is concerned. So, I re-checked the head space, and it was perfect. So, in my mind, I could only suspect the firing pin protrusion, and a random primer piercing. I measured it and found it to be about .007" over the max. I have now adjusted that to middle correct .045" protrusion. Soooo, my question is, has any other forum members had this issue and the beginning of catastrophic failure? Anyway, the chase continues... best, til....lat'r.....GT... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 2 members says Thank You to G.T. for your post: |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,955
Thanks: 2,057
Thanked 4,573 Times in 2,110 Posts
|
![]()
Nope
But I've had a luger get all weird, I sent it to GT to fix ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 5 members says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post: |
![]() |
#3 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 74
Thanks: 76
Thanked 88 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
Photos?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 3,706 Times in 1,011 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Ed and Deputywood, sorry no pictures! And I talked to G.T. and he said he can fix it!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lifer X5
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 708
Thanks: 87
Thanked 522 Times in 201 Posts
|
![]()
be VERY careful test firing that weapon.
do you have a weapons holding device in an enclosure which can be fired remotely...? I'd fire a box of shell thru it before trusting it in my hand again..... Tom |
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to tomaustin for your post: |
![]() |
#6 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 3,706 Times in 1,011 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Tom, I agree! I have replaced the barrel and breechblock, hopefully with the correct ammo and the reduced firing pin protrusion, we'll get by without incident... I'll know more tomorrow, range test in the am, Thanks and best to all, til....lat'r.....GT....
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 3 members says Thank You to G.T. for your post: |
![]() |
#7 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 3,706 Times in 1,011 Posts
|
![]()
Hi to all, well, wasn't too bad, one failure to extract, but ran a few magazings full and had only the one failure? Going to address that going forward. But, repro Navy barrel had a bit too large of width and maybe depth on the extractor relief notch on the barrel, and the brass was slightly bulged? Not so much as it would be an issue, but too much for my liking. Worst part is I'm running out of quality parts?
![]() By the way, primer strikes looked perfect, ammo was WW target 115 gr. ball, no pressure signs, all looked greast when done... More soon.. best, til...lat'r....GT ... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 3,706 Times in 1,011 Posts
|
![]()
Hi to all! Well, what i ended up with was nice, but mongrel Navy shooter top end? I ended up replacing the barrel with a standard 6" standard barrel with the standared front sight base. So, I also installed a new front sight that is .300" high to compensate for the shorter front sight base... Also replaced the extractor spring with the stiffer one, and the range test thru 30 rounds was perfect! It's alive!!!
![]() ![]() One might ask, what seems to be the problem, well, you can look at it this way, when assembling a Luger from parts, there are two distinct types of parts, there are new parts and then there are good parts? As in Forest Gump, you never know what you're going to get? Best to all, til....lat'r.....GT... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following 3 members says Thank You to G.T. for your post: |
![]() |
#9 | |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,733
Thanks: 815
Thanked 1,760 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Twenty eight years ago I bought a 1914 Erfurt Artillery Luger. It has a replacement side plate and locking bolt. All else matches. When I got it, I fired a magazine - 8 rounds - through it. Function was perfect. Today it was fired 10 rounds. I wanted a friend to experience shooting an Artillery Luger with an Artillery stock on it so I let him fire five rounds after which I fired an additional five. Again, function was perfect. We were shooting a silhouette steel target 10.5 x 18" at 25 yards. His shots were pretty well centered. Mine went high as the rear sight had climbed to about the 200 meter setting. I gave it a good cleaning and oiling and it's been put away. I'll likely never shoot it again but it certainly has the migrating rear sight problem. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The following 3 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post: |
![]() |
|
|