my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
12-04-2014, 03:29 AM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
ID a unique bringback Luger
My great uncle brought back a number of souvenirs from WW2, including an Iron Cross (Second Class), an Honour Cross and a Veteran's Breast Eagle pin. All of which would indicate an German soldier that had fought in WW1, also serving in WW2. I think the Luger may have also been this soldiers weapon in WW1. It is a commercial model, early edition. Inside the magazine well, there is a "Prv", and I have read that may indicate a a series of commercial Lugers purchased by Germany for resale to officers. There is also a picture of a woman in the grip, and I am not sure if it is my great aunt Ludie May, or if it was the sweetheart of the original owner of this Luger. It was all in a nice shadow box, but I have removed the Luger to place it in a more secure place and not hanging on my wall.
Any pointers on how to definitively the date for this Luger, or clues on it's value, would be appreciated. |
The following member says Thank You to mvaughn25 for your post: |
12-04-2014, 07:26 AM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Thanks: 0
Thanked 81 Times in 41 Posts
|
Love those "Sweet Heart" grips! Part of the guns history but diehard collectors will blanch. The Luger is a 1906 Commercial model. Nice find!
|
12-04-2014, 07:52 AM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
|
Your Great Uncle is the likely candidate for the grip modification. Rarely did German Soldiers modify their weapons in a decorative fashion.
|
12-04-2014, 09:06 AM | #4 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,605 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Mark, Welcome to the forum! Thanks for posting your beautiful Commercial Luger, a true family heirloom. I would make no effort to remove that photo, it's part of the gun's history now.
The holster looks Imperial, does it have any markings inside or on the back? Regards, Norm |
The following member says Thank You to Norme for your post: |
12-04-2014, 09:47 AM | #5 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,091
Thanked 5,180 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
A very nice Luger. It is a 1908 Commercial in 9mm. A real prize and I agree with Norm that, while it does detract somewhat from a pure collector standpoint, the photo grip is a charming part of the gun's history and should remain with the piece.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
12-04-2014, 10:11 AM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
|
I agree with all the previous posts, it's a bautiful Luger, but as a collector I'm a bit of a purist, and I would definitely prefer a gun with its original untouched grips, still yours are particularly nice and in fact deserve to remain where they have been in these past decades.
Sergio
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list. |
12-04-2014, 11:09 AM | #7 |
Lifer 2X
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,638
Thanks: 3,182
Thanked 2,569 Times in 957 Posts
|
Buy a set of repro grips and put the originals up for safe keeping. Agree they belong with the gun. Bill
__________________
Bill Lyon |
12-04-2014, 11:25 AM | #8 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
It would be interesting to determine if the woman is indeed Ludie Mae, or someone else. Are the grips each numbered to the gun?
This certainly is a wonderful heirloom. As stated above, it is a 1908 Commercial model, no stock lug or hold-open (?). The others can date it better but I'm guessing it was made in the 1908-1913 range. I'm not clear on the rationale behind the second set of numbers under the barrel (118.36?). Also, are the numbers on the front of the frame 42356?. Any letter beneath the numbers? The witness mark doesn't line up perfectly. Interesting fodder for discussion, as it's been bloody quiet around here lately. dju |
12-04-2014, 11:52 AM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
The weapon is in good shape, I had considered having a gunsmith (familiar with Lugers) give it a good look and then maybe take my cousin to the range and fire it. However, if I use this, I will replace the grips to preserve them and not let the picture get damaged from use (like Bill mentioned).
If I have read correctly, model 1908 refers to the year the German Army adopted this weapon, regardless of the production date? At one point, I thought I found a chart that placed this series of serial numbers to 1907-1908, can anyone point me to a way to verify that? David, I have also wondered about the 118.36 under the barrel. I saw one reference that it was related to the caliber? Also the serial number on the barrel and front of frame is 42856 (8 and not 3 in the middle). This all looked great in the shadow box, but I cannot leave a valuable/dangerous weapon in a simple shadow box on my wall. I will place a picture of my uncle in a Jeep (somewhere in Europe) where the weapon was. I will check the holster for markings later. It still has the tool in a pouch at the top and the current wooden bottom magazine was in the holster. My cousin removed the original magazine when he put it in the shadow box, and should have it around the house. Any information on the "Prv" stamp in the magazine well? I have read it designated groups of commercial weapons bought by the German government for resale to soldiers. Any good documentation on that? With the WW2 era medals (issued just before hostility broke out), issued to WW1 veterans, it is interested provenance that this could have been captured from a soldier that not only server in both wars, but possibly used this weapon in both as a personal purchase. |
12-04-2014, 11:54 AM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I essentially want to document all of this and place it with the shadow box as I rebuild it in the next month or so, for future reference. I am documenting the coins, pins, medals and everything to preserve that for future generations.
Any valuations are for curiosity or possibly insurance, this weapon will never leave our family and will always stay with the other items. Never understand how people could part with family heirlooms like this. |
12-04-2014, 12:11 PM | #11 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
The numbers regarding bore diameter are generally something close to 8.83 or 8.84 (land to land measurement). Yours looks like 118.36 if I am reading it correctly.
Regarding value, from a purely business standpoint, all sentiment aside, maybe $1400-$1650 for the gun and holster. It would be higher had the grip not been mod'ed. But mind you that is my WAG, and may not be how more experienced collectors see it. But if I were to insure it I would go with $2k. dju |
12-04-2014, 12:23 PM | #12 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,605 Times in 933 Posts
|
The 118,36 is a bore measurement now archaic for pistols, but still in use for shotguns (12 bore, 16 bore etc.). It's the size of bore that would accommodate lead balls 118.36 to the pound.
Imperial era Commercial Lugers numbered into 5 digits with no suffixes. Regards, Norm |
The following 4 members says Thank You to Norme for your post: |
12-04-2014, 03:22 PM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Norm, is there a way to narrow down the year by the serial number and other markings? If not, what year range does "Imperial Era" cover?
Thanks, -Mark |
12-04-2014, 03:38 PM | #14 |
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,605 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Mark, The "Imperial Era" as far as Luger collectors are concerned means anything earlier than Nov 1918 when Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated. I don't collect Commercial Lugers so can't help much with a date for yours, but I would think about 1914. Maybe a Commercial collector could narrow it down further.
Regards, Norm |
12-04-2014, 03:58 PM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
|
I'm not an expert but considering that the date was printed only from 1910 (but not on commercial guns) and we find the stock lug only on lugers made after 1914 this gun I guess must have been made around 1908.
IMHO Sergio
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list. |
12-04-2014, 04:58 PM | #16 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,530 Times in 787 Posts
|
It's a BUG proof so it probably dates 1908-1910. In your pistol's condition it is pretty scarce and with the Prv marking probably worth close to $3000.
|
The following member says Thank You to George Anderson for your post: |
12-04-2014, 07:34 PM | #17 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,091
Thanked 5,180 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
George's estimate is pretty close to the mark. Not a common garden variety Luger at all.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
12-04-2014, 07:39 PM | #18 |
User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
George, am I right on the "Prv" marking designating a weapon bought by the Getman gov, to be sold to soldiers? Only found a few references to that, but nothing definitive.
|
12-04-2014, 08:23 PM | #19 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
Mark:
There you have it. You'll not find more expert opinions anywhere. dju |
12-04-2014, 09:02 PM | #20 |
Lifer 2X
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,638
Thanks: 3,182
Thanked 2,569 Times in 957 Posts
|
Nice luger. For the record the stock lug appeared in 1913. In 1913 one may find both. I have a 1913 DWM with stock lug serial number 4012 b. I believe this is near the serial number where the stock lug appeared. Bill
__________________
Bill Lyon |
|
|