So you want more pic's eh....

Missing Something · 01-25-2007, 01:46 PM

Not dial-up friendly..... Here is some more pic's..... any info you can add would be appreciated.....

Sorry again for the out of focus pics... not my camera... I should have some new ones in the future. Please let me know if you want any other specific pics on any of the parts....

Cheers,
Craig

George Anderson · 01-25-2007, 04:58 PM

I would strongly recommend that you switch magazines between this LP08 and your '06 Dutch.

Dwight Gruber · 01-25-2007, 06:25 PM

Craig,

George has understated the case.

Your friend has taken the very valuable proper Dutch magazine from the Dutch Luger you showed us, and carelessly put it with this Artillery. You should have him put it back with the Dutch Luger forthwith--it increases the value of the gun, and it would be a shame to take the chance of the two items accidentally parting ways permanently.

--Dwight

Pete Ebbink · 01-26-2007, 03:19 PM

Is it considered proper/correct for a 1918 dated DWM artillery to still have the adjustable front sight ???

I thought most (maybe not all...) of those disappeared in the 1917 time frame...

(Text Added : Found this info about 1918's over on Jan Still's Gun Boards : )

http://luger.gunboards.com/topic.asp...justable+sight

01-25-2007, 01:46 PM	#1
Missing Something User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 21 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	So you want more pic's eh.... Not dial-up friendly..... Here is some more pic's..... any info you can add would be appreciated..... Sorry again for the out of focus pics... not my camera... I should have some new ones in the future. Please let me know if you want any other specific pics on any of the parts.... Cheers, Craig

01-25-2007, 04:58 PM	#2
George Anderson Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: VA Posts: 3,592 Thanks: 1,773 Thanked 2,531 Times in 788 Posts	I would strongly recommend that you switch magazines between this LP08 and your '06 Dutch.

01-25-2007, 06:25 PM	#3
Dwight Gruber User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Portland, Oregon Posts: 3,908 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts	Craig, George has understated the case. Your friend has taken the very valuable proper Dutch magazine from the Dutch Luger you showed us, and carelessly put it with this Artillery. You should have him put it back with the Dutch Luger forthwith--it increases the value of the gun, and it would be a shame to take the chance of the two items accidentally parting ways permanently. --Dwight

01-26-2007, 03:19 PM	#4
Pete Ebbink User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The USA Posts: 5,919 Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts	Is it considered proper/correct for a 1918 dated DWM artillery to still have the adjustable front sight ??? I thought most (maybe not all...) of those disappeared in the 1917 time frame... (Text Added : Found this info about 1918's over on Jan Still's Gun Boards : ) http://luger.gunboards.com/topic.asp...justable+sight