LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Navy Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-09-2012, 02:21 PM   #1
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default George Anderson Came Through To Help Correct a Stock

About 8 years ago I purchased this 08 Navy and later bought a navy stock. I could never get it to fit. I found out it was the commercial version. George found me the correct one and also a beautiful artillery duel mag holster. Its nice to have a real mentor!! TKS George
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	GEORGE navy 1.jpg
Views:	257
Size:	233.3 KB
ID:	29195  

Click image for larger version

Name:	GEORGE navy 2.jpg
Views:	245
Size:	241.3 KB
ID:	29196  

Click image for larger version

Name:	GEORGE navy 3.jpg
Views:	237
Size:	191.9 KB
ID:	29197  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 7 members says Thank You to cirelaw for your post:
Unread 10-09-2012, 04:44 PM   #2
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

C:
Please explain the diff. on a commercial version and how it can effect holster fit.
And by the way, that is one nice Navy...!
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post:
Unread 10-09-2012, 04:56 PM   #3
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Thank You!The commercial doesn't have the round plate. I could never make the small handle go up with my first one!. It never fit at all! George spotted it. It was new to me!I was told it serial to Ureguay??? I learned my own relutance to ask! I think we could use a good book on Navy lugers. Ive never seen a commercial luger and would'nt know the difference between the two.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	navy oold board.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	243.5 KB
ID:	29198  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to cirelaw for your post:
Unread 10-16-2012, 09:32 AM   #4
irishcop45
User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Central PA
Posts: 21
Thanks: 17
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

What a beautiful rig you have there! I'm new to Lugers, but have always admired the Navy pistol.
irishcop45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-16-2012, 08:22 PM   #5
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Thank You, #2525b, I bought from Ralph before he died! George found me the military board. Ralph sold me a commecial navy board that wouldn't fit. If anyone needs a commercial navy board I believe George might have one! Tks Eric
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-16-2012, 08:28 PM   #6
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

No Problem. 1908 Serial #2505b, I'll post some nice pics in the AM. Eric.... Just off the press! I beleive the numbers on the frame are inspection marks???
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1908 navy 1.jpg
Views:	223
Size:	239.9 KB
ID:	29435  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1908 navy 2.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	243.5 KB
ID:	29436  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1908 navy 3.jpg
Views:	227
Size:	242.8 KB
ID:	29437  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1908 navy 4.jpg
Views:	221
Size:	195.1 KB
ID:	29438  

Click image for larger version

Name:	1908 navy 5.jpg
Views:	256
Size:	91.5 KB
ID:	29439  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-02-2013, 09:09 PM   #7
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

I just noticed Bob Simpson has a 1908 Navy with 'Germany' on its side and mine doesn't. Are we both correct mine is 2505b ? Is this a commercial model?
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2013, 12:18 AM   #8
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
Default

Both your and Simpson's Navy Lugers are military. Simpson's was exported for commercial sale after WWI and received the "Germany" export stamp, yours probably came home with a GI.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Unread 01-03-2013, 09:27 AM   #9
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Way Cool. Thank You Ron!
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2013, 09:28 AM   #10
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
Default

There is still some confusion about Eric's original statement. Eric, you mentioned "holster" but I'm assuming you meant "stock". Were you stating that your commercial stock would not lock onto your military Naval Luger or where you talking about the leather holster?

I'm guessing you meant that your stock was not correct, as it did not include a military data disk, which would be correct for your military pistol and that your new military stock does lock onto your pistol properly.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to alanint for your post:
Unread 01-03-2013, 09:35 AM   #11
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

You are correct! I had purchased the 1908 navy and its navy leather holster and stock from Ralph Shattuck. Jerry provided all the leather. Later I purchased the board but never would lock. George Anderson sold me a correct military board so we have a commercial navy board to sell. I'm told its from Ureguay!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ureguay 1.jpg
Views:	217
Size:	246.4 KB
ID:	31015  

Click image for larger version

Name:	ureguay 2.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	242.6 KB
ID:	31016  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2013, 09:43 AM   #12
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,154
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,306 Times in 1,097 Posts
Default

Thanks Alanint,

I presumed the same and was making edits to Eric first post when you posted.

Eric, That is a REALLY NICE Navy Luger! I am envious...

Quote:
Originally Posted by cirelaw View Post
I think we could use a good book on Navy lugers.
Also Eric, you mentioned the need for a good Navy Luger book. There IS a Navy Luger book, but as nice as it is, it is old and is based on old information and doesn't contain sufficient detail for today's collectors based on discoveries and research over the last couple of decades.

Our late hero, friend, and Navy Luger Forum moderator, Tom Armstrong, was co-authoring a new Navy Luger book when his untimely death occured.

Perhaps George Anderson can enlighten us on what has happened to the manuscript and the effort to produce that book? It's publication would be very welcome in the collector community and a fitting final tribute to our late friend Tom.
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 4 members says Thank You to John Sabato for your post:
Unread 01-03-2013, 10:09 AM   #13
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

Thank You John. Heres another few!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	navy bomb 1.jpg
Views:	247
Size:	100.6 KB
ID:	31018  

Click image for larger version

Name:	navy bomb 2.jpg
Views:	220
Size:	97.2 KB
ID:	31019  

Click image for larger version

Name:	jerrys navy 1.jpg
Views:	229
Size:	242.9 KB
ID:	31263  

Click image for larger version

Name:	jerrys navy 2.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	243.7 KB
ID:	31264  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to cirelaw for your post:
Unread 04-09-2013, 03:57 PM   #14
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

What percent were Navy marked? Unfortunatly mine wasn't although my Weimer double dated Erfurt artillery was drafted by the nazi navy as evidenced below! See 'WEIMER AND EARLY NAZI LUGER' pages 203-204 'Early Nazi Navy Markings reported both were DWM!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	alleys navy.jpg
Views:	203
Size:	101.6 KB
ID:	33182  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-09-2013, 09:29 PM   #15
Mark1
User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 72
Thanks: 332
Thanked 74 Times in 25 Posts
Default

Cirelaw,
Thanks for the previous pics of your beautiful 1908 navy.
Please could you show some more of your navy marked Erfurt artillery ?
Mark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-09-2013, 10:15 PM   #16
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default I posted some of these month ago

But can't find my thread!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 1.jpg
Views:	245
Size:	109.0 KB
ID:	33183  

Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 2.jpg
Views:	246
Size:	145.9 KB
ID:	33184  

Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 3.jpg
Views:	223
Size:	84.7 KB
ID:	33185  

Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 4.jpg
Views:	241
Size:	91.3 KB
ID:	33186  

Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 5.jpg
Views:	231
Size:	239.1 KB
ID:	33187  

Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 6.jpg
Views:	217
Size:	236.5 KB
ID:	33188  

Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 7.jpg
Views:	226
Size:	236.0 KB
ID:	33189  

Click image for larger version

Name:	NUMBER 8.jpg
Views:	232
Size:	191.3 KB
ID:	33190  

Click image for larger version

Name:	a mark.jpg
Views:	224
Size:	101.6 KB
ID:	33191  

cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to cirelaw for your post:
Unread 02-22-2021, 12:23 AM   #17
spripple33
User
 
spripple33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 85
Thanks: 137
Thanked 167 Times in 54 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cirelaw View Post
What percent were Navy marked? Unfortunatly mine wasn't although my Weimer double dated Erfurt artillery was drafted by the nazi navy as evidenced below! See 'WEIMER AND EARLY NAZI LUGER' pages 203-204 'Early Nazi Navy Markings reported both were DWM!
Quite a few of the 1st and 2nd issue 1906 Navy Lugers are unit marked but not many of the other variations of P.04 are. Hardly any 1916 or 1917 dated ones are. Not sure about Weimar or Nazi Navy...

Here's a pic of the unit marking on my 1906 1st issue.
Attached Images
 
spripple33 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to spripple33 for your post:
Unread 02-22-2021, 05:18 PM   #18
cirelaw
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,133 Times in 2,173 Posts
Default

I think the disc makes the difference!
cirelaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-22-2021, 08:21 PM   #19
LU1900
User
 
LU1900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 908
Thanks: 41
Thanked 469 Times in 197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cirelaw View Post
I think the disc makes the difference!
I agree , and beautiful exemple !
__________________
Best regards from France...Patrice
https://www.fichier-pdf.fr/2016/03/1...nd-snail-drum/
LU1900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-22-2021, 09:58 PM   #20
m1903a3
User
 
m1903a3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 198
Thanks: 26
Thanked 315 Times in 112 Posts
Default

The commercial and military Navy stocks were physically identical. Originally, the military ones had no stock disc and were identified as military by a large Crown/M stamp on the left side of the wood.

The discs were made standard in 1910, with many of the early ones refitted by adding the disc.

As for fit, the stocks were hand fitted to the matching pistol, like many other Luger parts. It's not unusual to find original, correct but not matching number, stocks need a bit a tweaking to fit a particular pistol.
__________________
- Mike
Life member: NRA, OVMS, VGCA
Member: NAPCA, N-SSA(Veteran)

Si vis pacem, para bellum
m1903a3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to m1903a3 for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com