my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
12-12-2018, 01:28 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 10
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
1914 Erfurt stock markings
Newbie here looking for an explanation of these marks found on the upper edge of a stock. Thanks !
|
The following member says Thank You to smokey stover for your post: |
12-12-2018, 09:04 PM | #2 |
Moderator
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,772
Thanks: 4,931
Thanked 3,124 Times in 1,434 Posts
|
Rob, The stock isn't an original WW1 imperial German Luger stock so the markings are really so much gibberish. Do you have a photo of the whole stock?
__________________
Jerry Burney 11491 S. Guadalupe Drive Yuma AZ 85367-6182 lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net 928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round 719 207-3331 (cell) "For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know." |
12-13-2018, 12:10 AM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 10
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
more photos
There is also a ".32" stamped in the pistol at the rear. Is that anything to do with the ".32" in the wood ?
|
The following 2 members says Thank You to smokey stover for your post: |
12-13-2018, 12:20 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 848
Thanks: 784
Thanked 861 Times in 411 Posts
|
An initial thought would be .32 caliber, but as an Erfurt it’s all but certain to be a 9mm military gun, correct?
__________________
-QM Looking for Mauser S/42 toggle train #22 |
12-13-2018, 12:36 AM | #5 |
Moderator
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,772
Thanks: 4,931
Thanked 3,124 Times in 1,434 Posts
|
There is also a ".32" stamped in the pistol at the rear. Is that anything to do with the ".32" in the wood ? Rob, No, sort of..someone with a set of stamps went crazy on this rig. The .32 on your pistol is a defacement. I am sure it had something to do with Mr. happy stampy but it's all bogus. The stock, leathers, markings, everything to do with this except your pistol, is bad and your pistol has a bad .32 on it. All meaningless. Unless you can find Mr. happy stampy and waterboard it out of him.
You will NEVER see a number on an Artillery unless it's a a unit mark, with a period in front of it. The stock has brass washers used on vintage kitchen splash board and the stock iron has huge screw heads.
__________________
Jerry Burney 11491 S. Guadalupe Drive Yuma AZ 85367-6182 lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net 928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round 719 207-3331 (cell) "For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know." |
The following 3 members says Thank You to lugerholsterrepair for your post: |
12-13-2018, 01:19 AM | #6 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
Jerry,
You are most likely 100% correct, you usually are, but I am a bit inclined to give this one the benefit of the doubt and give it a second look. Even though the stock is very dark walnut, the slots for the shoulder strap appear like they might be chamfered on both sides like a repro (I'm not sure they are), and the stock iron screws most likely are replacements, there is a bit of logic to the markings. The markings are non-standard but they do fit the format described by Görtz and Bryans for 4th Artillery Regiment, 5th Battery, weapon #32, and the weapon inventory number 32 is matched on the gun in the same style. The 1920 property mark and strange other undecipherable mark where the crown/fraktur letter would be are a puzzle, but I am not quite ready to throw the baby out with the bath water. Respectfully, Ron P.S. I haven't heard of "Smokey Stover" in years...Rob must be nearly as old as I am!
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
The following 3 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
12-13-2018, 01:35 AM | #7 |
Moderator
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,772
Thanks: 4,931
Thanked 3,124 Times in 1,434 Posts
|
Ron, I LOVE an optimist! AND a good course and discourse! There is an explanation for the "fit the format described by Görtz and Bryans" either happenstance, serendipity or Mr Happy Stampy copied it from a known unit mark? If you take a close look at the stock, the stock well is all kinds of misshapen/too deep and on the other side the slots are not correct. Beveled around the edges. The acceptance mark if that's what we can call it..certainly not imperial! OK, 1920, another case of Mr. Happy Stamps and some familiarity with the subject Luger. NOW we have a bunch of fake cow peelings attached and it all comes together as blasphemy for those of us who worship at the George Luger alter. Some hunch, some fiction and some fact..but put me down as a non believer.
__________________
Jerry Burney 11491 S. Guadalupe Drive Yuma AZ 85367-6182 lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net 928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round 719 207-3331 (cell) "For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know." |
12-13-2018, 01:46 AM | #8 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
Jerry,
While you were posting I was editing my post. I am not sure the stock slots are incorrect. To my eye, the forward side (toward the front of the stock) are worn but are not beveled like repros (agree that the well looks lousy). Need some more detailed photos, likewise for fake cow peelings...need to see better shots of the stock iron cup, etc. Not sure I am a believer either, but I need more convincing. Again, respectfully Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
The following 2 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
12-13-2018, 07:20 AM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 10
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
a few more
still more photos,( by now I think it may be obvious that I dont make a living in photography !)
|
12-13-2018, 07:48 AM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 10
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
another
the cleaning rod stamped "32" also
|
12-13-2018, 09:31 AM | #11 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
Would it behoove anyone to ask SS to (carefully) remove the screws from the stock attachment iron and closely photo them?
dju |
The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post: |
12-13-2018, 09:59 AM | #12 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,529 Times in 787 Posts
|
The 32 on the fake cleaning rod is the final nail. Jerry's verdict is correct. Also the unit marking on the stock follows Imperial regulation while the 32 on the rear frame, were it genuine, would be a pre 1922 Reichswehr provisional marking. Me thinks the "artist" was un-stuck in time.
|
The following member says Thank You to George Anderson for your post: |
12-13-2018, 10:14 AM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,350 Times in 2,040 Posts
|
I'm with Jerry and George,
there is nothing right about the stock- aged and incorrectly stamped "boosted" reproduction. The latch has a flat end, which is also a reproduction tell. The "32" on the back of the luger should at least have the battery number also. Shame what was done to the luger; and I can't see enough of the holster to have an idea.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
12-13-2018, 11:56 AM | #14 |
Moderator
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,772
Thanks: 4,931
Thanked 3,124 Times in 1,434 Posts
|
Good morning gents! Thank you Rob for the additional photo's. It is as feared, a fanciful tale told in wood & leather. George & Don make some good points..The latch has a flat end, which is also a reproduction tell, I meant to mention myself yesterday but it was late and I forgot but as Don says..always a reproduction tell. Also the carry strap..the holes should have a teardrop shape and the cup dear Yorick, is empty. I was waiting to see the underside of the toe strap but it;s not needed now. The cleaning rod is a mighty long nail but nail it is!
It's more likely than not to find some of these same spurious markings on the holster? Rob, if you have time or inclination after this beating..we might as well look at the rest of it?
__________________
Jerry Burney 11491 S. Guadalupe Drive Yuma AZ 85367-6182 lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net 928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round 719 207-3331 (cell) "For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know." |
The following member says Thank You to lugerholsterrepair for your post: |
12-13-2018, 03:30 PM | #15 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
OK, time to throw in the towel. Thanks guys.
Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
The following member says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post: |
12-13-2018, 05:16 PM | #16 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,183
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
|
Nobody mentioned one of the most common 'tells' of an original artillery...The correct lineup of the two attaching iron screwdriver slots...
How many repros have the slots aligned??? My fantasy artilleries all have repro attaching iron and none have aligned slots and it would be difficult to align them...
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter... |
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post: |
|
|