LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Commercial Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-16-2012, 03:17 AM   #1
HisSoldier
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 95
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Default Power of P-08 ammo in the 1920's

In another forum a guy with a very nice 1920's commercial P-08 was warned not to shoot it because metallurgy wasn't what it is now. The point was also made that one might happen upon higher strength ammo.

I maintain that the materials used by DWM, and the heat treating processes, were probably state of the science of the day, and that the strength of the action unless degraded by corrosion, fire, or battering should be almost identical to the day it came out of DWM.

It's the guns that are made today that I have my doubts about, there are some really poor materials in many guns made today because people can't seem to tell the difference between Zamak and medium carbon steel.

Does anyone know what the 9MM and 7.65MM standard ammunition power was compared to what we buy over the counter today? I would guess it's not as powerful, because of liability fears, except for +P stuff.
__________________
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom
HisSoldier is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to HisSoldier for your post:
Unread 02-16-2012, 08:49 AM   #2
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

I know of no side-by-side comparisons to new vs. old ammo, and even close comparisons today may not be accurate to the pressures experienced with the same ammo. 90 years ago.
What I'd always look for is the least powerful ammo that will correctly function the pistol, and call it good.
Like you said, the +P stuff is to be avoided, as well as some military SMG ammo.
And I agree that if you have a nice Luger thats value is based on the fact that it is 100% matching numbers, it probably isn't a good decision to shoot it. Parts do break today, just like they did back then.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post:
Unread 02-17-2012, 06:54 PM   #3
padredan
User
 
padredan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: louisiana Now, but from the Rebublic of Texas
Posts: 937
Thanks: 429
Thanked 316 Times in 182 Posts
Default

this got me to thinking and looking at somethings. Looking to find some low power 9mm ammo that will function. or close to the pessure of the earlier military loads.I haven't reloaded in years, i have fired the two lugers i own and i am now thinking i really do not need to be. Take a look at the two pics, first was when i bought it and second after about three mags full of remington umc 115 gr, big difference there, others are calling it a luger fingerprint. one thing for i am going to be really cautious from now on, there has to be some moderen ammo out there that is safe to fire/thanks
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	0106 12 008.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	78.9 KB
ID:	24390  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00372.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	76.8 KB
ID:	24391  

__________________
In this world nothing is free, except the grace of God

Last edited by padredan; 02-20-2012 at 12:51 AM.
padredan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-17-2012, 07:15 PM   #4
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,929
Thanks: 2,029
Thanked 4,527 Times in 2,090 Posts
Default

Unless there is actual metallurgical deformity, this is a normal action of firing.

That said, when I find a luger without any wear there, it makes me think it has been reblued.


Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Edward Tinker for your post:
Unread 02-17-2012, 08:52 PM   #5
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,909
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts
Default

Use standard velocity ammo like the Winchester 115gn white box low cost ammo you can find in Walmart.

Don't use something that is rated as "NATO". It's higher power and higher velocity.

The Remmington ammo is apparently about 50fps hotter than the Winchester.

One thing to verify is that the recoil spring is the right one for the model Luger you're shooting, and that it's in good condition (consider a new Wolff replacement for the Luger you'll be shooting regularly).

You can get a range of recoil spring strengths in a kit as well...

Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to mrerick for your post:
Unread 02-19-2012, 05:03 PM   #6
padredan
User
 
padredan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: louisiana Now, but from the Rebublic of Texas
Posts: 937
Thanks: 429
Thanked 316 Times in 182 Posts
Default

Marc, what i have found is the white box winchester i have is marked nato, is there another white box winchester?
__________________
In this world nothing is free, except the grace of God
padredan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2012, 07:07 PM   #7
rhuff
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
rhuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,289
Thanks: 2,707
Thanked 971 Times in 716 Posts
Default

I am not Mark, but yes, there is a standard WWB ammo. I have had good luck also with 115gr FMJ PMC ammo, and the Federal Champion 115gr FMJ. All of this ammo is low cost "range" ammo, and I have no qualms about shooting it in my 9mm Lugers.
rhuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to rhuff for your post:
Unread 02-19-2012, 07:32 PM   #8
padredan
User
 
padredan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: louisiana Now, but from the Rebublic of Texas
Posts: 937
Thanks: 429
Thanked 316 Times in 182 Posts
Default

thanks, i have some 115gr pmc and a good bit of federal american eagle, i will look for winchester white box not marked nato, thanks again
__________________
In this world nothing is free, except the grace of God
padredan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2012, 08:16 PM   #9
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Hi:

Here is an answer to your specific question.

German Army loads for the 9mm, were, through WWII, 123 gr. bullet at 1,076 fps. This was the standard brass cased load for pistol usage, not to be confused with the steel cased iron core bullet ammo used in the SMGs.

The standard NATO load of today is 117 grs at 1,260 fps.

You can do the math, but beware of shooting modern "HOT" ammo through your vintage Luger.

Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Sieger for your post:
Unread 02-19-2012, 08:24 PM   #10
padredan
User
 
padredan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: louisiana Now, but from the Rebublic of Texas
Posts: 937
Thanks: 429
Thanked 316 Times in 182 Posts
Default

outstanding, many thanks
__________________
In this world nothing is free, except the grace of God
padredan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2012, 08:27 PM   #11
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,909
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts
Default

Here's the info on the Winchester:

Manufacturer: Winchester

UPC: 020892201989

9mm Luger Winchester USA Handgun Cartridge, 115-Grain Full Metal Jacket Bullet, 50 Rounds Per Box

362 ft/lbs. energy muzzle
1071 fps at 50 yards
293 ft/lbs. at 50 yards

Remington and others have similar.

MArc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to mrerick for your post:
Unread 02-21-2012, 10:12 PM   #12
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,900
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,312 Times in 430 Posts
Default

The powder for the original 9x19mm cartridge was slower burning than what is used in commercial ammunition today. It operates the action more efficiently than contemporary ammunition, which is where the myth that Lugers require "hotter" ammunition comes from.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 5 members says Thank You to Dwight Gruber for your post:
Unread 02-22-2012, 07:35 PM   #13
MAngelo
User
 
MAngelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

For all you shooters of 115 gr loads- Does anyone else find that their Luger's point-of-impact is lower than the point-of-aim? I too use the WWB 115 gr bullets, in both FMJ and HP. I've been curious about trying a 124 gr load, to raise the POI, and have been looking into the various manufacturers' published velocities. I read that the original 9mm Luger load was a 124 gr bullet at around 1070 fps. The POI with my Luger is lower than the POA, and don't want to change the front sight.
It shoots consistently, however, enough to shoot 4 shots into a cloverleaf shape at 8 yards, all overlapping.
Thanks.
MAngelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-04-2012, 02:08 PM   #14
HisSoldier
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 95
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Default

You guys got me reassessing my own loads, My target was 1200FPS, and there's no reason for it! I load for plinking/target shooting, and it makes sense to load for minimum function power.
__________________
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom
HisSoldier is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to HisSoldier for your post:
Unread 03-04-2012, 11:23 PM   #15
Ed Mc
User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 10
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

" Does anyone else find that their Luger's point-of-impact is lower "

Mine was the opposite with the same Win white box. Indoor range with the target ~25 feet. Good grouping but six or more inches high. Only shot a few rds as I found the pistol was missing the locking bolt spring. Oops........
Ed Mc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2012, 05:16 AM   #16
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Mc View Post
" Does anyone else find that their Luger's point-of-impact is lower "

Mine was the opposite with the same Win white box. Indoor range with the target ~25 feet. Good grouping but six or more inches high. Only shot a few rds as I found the pistol was missing the locking bolt spring. Oops........
Hi:

Somewhere, I remember reading the actual distance the Lugers were sighted for. I believe it was 25 meters.

Can anyone verify this?

Thanks!!


Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Sieger for your post:
Unread 06-20-2012, 05:30 AM   #17
spartacus38
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Lake Tahoe,CA.
Posts: 695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 70 Times in 56 Posts
Default

I use 115 gr White Box Winchester and am always 3 to 5 inches high at 25 yds with many Lugers.
I am shooting at 5000 feet elevation if that makes any difference.
Bob
spartacus38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2012, 11:01 AM   #18
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sieger View Post
Hi:

Somewhere, I remember reading the actual distance the Lugers were sighted for. I believe it was 25 meters.

Can anyone verify this?

Thanks!!


Sieger
Hi Sieger, P08's were originally sighted for 100 meters and had a front sight blade 5.0mm tall. In 1914 this was changed to 50 meters by fitting a blade 5.5mm tall. Most of the earlier guns were retrofitted with the taller blade at the same time as they had hold-opens added. Regards, Norm
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 5 members says Thank You to Norme for your post:
Unread 06-20-2012, 12:45 PM   #19
lew1
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,108
Thanks: 82
Thanked 204 Times in 112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by padredan View Post
thanks, i have some 115gr pmc and a good bit of federal american eagle, i will look for winchester white box not marked nato, thanks again

The 'Nato' marked 9mm may have 124 gr. bullets.

In any event the white box 115 grain 9mm is marked with the Manufacturer's Item number of "Q4172"

Originally such was referred to as "Q" loads, later the white box.

That is what I believe you are looking for.
__________________
charlie
lew1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2012, 12:55 PM   #20
CavScoutEurope
User
 
CavScoutEurope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 86
Thanks: 102
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Good thing I saw this!! The only white box I saw at Wal-Mart was the NATO ammo, Now I have to go back and buy the correct ammo! I wonder if it makes a difference if the Luger was used by the VOPO? Did the East Germans make any changes to allow for "hotter" rounds? I know that my firing pin was replaced by them....
CavScoutEurope is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com