LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-19-2012, 11:51 PM   #1
skeeter4206
User
 
skeeter4206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 448
Thanks: 52
Thanked 88 Times in 49 Posts
Default SN double stamp on black widow

I was checking out this "Black widow" on the enclosed web page

http://www.legacy-collectibles.com/h...-hand-guns?p=2

I noticed the serial number had what appeared to be a double stamp on the front of the trigger guard. Has anyone seen this before on lugers? Whats yalls thoughts on this?

Click image for larger version

Name:	black widow.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	66.5 KB
ID:	29583

I have been wanting a black widow luger for a minute now. How do I determine a real black widow from a fake?

Thanks
Skeeter
skeeter4206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-20-2012, 12:22 AM   #2
skeeter4206
User
 
skeeter4206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 448
Thanks: 52
Thanked 88 Times in 49 Posts
Default

Looking at another one of my lugers and noticed a double stamp on the imperial proofs. This is a 1916 - SN 8034j. The toogle doesnt match the gun, but all else matches.

Presentation1.pdf

Is this proper and done as a russian capture gun?
skeeter4206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-20-2012, 01:39 AM   #3
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

It's not uncommon to see double strikes caused by stamps that bounced when struck. A proof or number stamped over a previously stamped proof or number is a different story.

There are no 1916 dated Lugers reported in the 'j' block in Jan Still's Central Powers Pistols. Could you post pics of the suffix?
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-20-2012, 02:32 AM   #4
skeeter4206
User
 
skeeter4206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 448
Thanks: 52
Thanked 88 Times in 49 Posts
Default

I assume this a "j". could be an "i".

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0273.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	125.0 KB
ID:	29586

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0269.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	105.3 KB
ID:	29587

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4631.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	67.9 KB
ID:	29588

I'd say its a"j" as a found this suffix chart in the military section.

skeeter4206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-20-2012, 09:34 AM   #5
CJS57
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Thanks: 0
Thanked 81 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Your double stamp is fine and was just factory workmanship error. Post pictures of the backside of the Black Widow grips!
CJS57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-20-2012, 08:43 PM   #6
MFC
User
 
MFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
Default

It looks like a 'j' to me also. You don't see it often. The only reported use of the 'j' suffix is on 1917 Erfurts. DWM and Mauser didn't use the 'j' suffix.
Thanks for the pics.
__________________
Mike C.
MFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-21-2012, 12:58 AM   #7
skeeter4206
User
 
skeeter4206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 448
Thanks: 52
Thanked 88 Times in 49 Posts
Default

interesting! Too bad I dont have the toggle that originally came on it. The gun came with a S/42 toggle. It shoots good though. I guess thats a plus.
skeeter4206 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com