tool original?

kunta · 11-04-2006, 05:25 PM

This tool is on ebay, is it an original?

Vlim · 11-04-2006, 06:25 PM

Hi, texture looks good, but there is not enough detail to be sure.

The cutout should have slightly larger edges and the thickness of the tool can't be judged. Nominal thickness of original tools is some 2.5 mm. Reproductions tend to be thicker.

Also, the thumb part is not visible. It should be smooth, not ribbed or engraved.

kunta · 11-04-2006, 08:24 PM

maybe this photo will help, this is the best I can do for now.

Vlim · 11-05-2006, 07:28 AM

Hi,

It looks real enough to me. Although measuring the thickness would be wise.

kunta · 11-05-2006, 07:53 AM

Thanks I bought two of these, both marked se63 the diff. is one mark is smaller than the other, If I understand what I searched out, there were two marks, one smaller then the other, if I am correct is one more valuable than the other, or not really, just goes to a different date gun rig? thanks for the help.

11-04-2006, 05:25 PM	#1
kunta Banned Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 52 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	tool original? This tool is on ebay, is it an original? Attached Images

11-04-2006, 08:24 PM	#3
kunta Banned Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 52 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	tool maybe this photo will help, this is the best I can do for now. Attached Images

11-04-2006, 06:25 PM	#2
Vlim Moderator Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Europe Posts: 5,048 Thanks: 1,034 Thanked 3,951 Times in 1,199 Posts	Hi, texture looks good, but there is not enough detail to be sure. The cutout should have slightly larger edges and the thickness of the tool can't be judged. Nominal thickness of original tools is some 2.5 mm. Reproductions tend to be thicker. Also, the thumb part is not visible. It should be smooth, not ribbed or engraved.

11-05-2006, 07:28 AM	#4
Vlim Moderator Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Europe Posts: 5,048 Thanks: 1,034 Thanked 3,951 Times in 1,199 Posts	Hi, It looks real enough to me. Although measuring the thickness would be wise.

11-05-2006, 07:53 AM	#5
kunta Banned Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 52 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Thanks I bought two of these, both marked se63 the diff. is one mark is smaller than the other, If I understand what I searched out, there were two marks, one smaller then the other, if I am correct is one more valuable than the other, or not really, just goes to a different date gun rig? thanks for the help.