This misplaced anger at the Supreme Court
Their job is to determine if a law is protected by the Constitution or against the constitution
"The right of the people to keep and BEAR arms" is in the Constitution
ergo the NYC law did infringe the BEAR arms and was unconstitutional
Abortion is not anywhere in the Constitution and was ruled as such
Not being in the Constitution means that CONGRESS could pass a law making it Federally legal overruling the States
Now someone would have to find some part of the Constitution that makes that law wrong.
But CONGRESS has not done so
Alternatively CONGRESS could submit a Constitutional Amendment to specifically add Abortion as a right to the Constitution. The wording of that would be problematic but that is what lawyers are for right?
But CONGRESS has not done so
CONGRESS is required to balance the budget - except where the existence of the country is at risk/under attack (WWII) they do not even attempt to do so
Except the right to keep arms - none of this has any bearing on the collection and/or shooting of Lugers
|