LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

John D. · 07-13-2004, 10:39 PM

Hey Pete,

Very nice....

The serialization to the holster is not original - but the LWaA stamp is, as it appears - but, it looks like the incorrect era LWaA (there are several variations). HK did NOT match holsters to serialized P-08s on first issue, so, I doubt the owner of serial # 5665 will be interested however..... In short - if it's not a counterfeit, it's an armour's replacement.

And no - the holsters were NOT serialized to the HK, in spite of "new found data".

Also - as an FYI - if it WERE matched to an HK, it WOULD have a holster manufacturers mark if matched to the year production of the serial number..

Any tool in there?

John D.

07-13-2004, 10:39 PM	#8
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 471 Thanked 513 Times in 127 Posts	Hey Pete, Very nice.... The serialization to the holster is not original - but the LWaA stamp is, as it appears - but, it looks like the incorrect era LWaA (there are several variations). HK did NOT match holsters to serialized P-08s on first issue, so, I doubt the owner of serial # 5665 will be interested however..... In short - if it's not a counterfeit, it's an armour's replacement. And no - the holsters were NOT serialized to the HK, in spite of "new found data". Also - as an FYI - if it WERE matched to an HK, it WOULD have a holster manufacturers mark if matched to the year production of the serial number.. Any tool in there? John D.