LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

John D. · 11-27-2001, 11:48 PM

I just tore my 1918 apart - and I see the same as you Lonnie - circle N as well an the N and the other markings. THe grips, as I mentioned in my first post - were cut out for a mag safety - but I didn't think then - nor do I now that they were original to the gun (no sear cut/rivet hole)..

I still think Tinmans gun is correct (except for the grips).

11-27-2001, 11:48 PM	#22
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 471 Thanked 513 Times in 127 Posts	Re: Magazine Safety I just tore my 1918 apart - and I see the same as you Lonnie - circle N as well an the N and the other markings. THe grips, as I mentioned in my first post - were cut out for a mag safety - but I didn't think then - nor do I now that they were original to the gun (no sear cut/rivet hole).. I still think Tinmans gun is correct (except for the grips).