[mrerick]

And now we hear of widespread corruption of the scientific process often within government funded projects. Here is one example;

https://thereload.com/emails-cdc-rem...ivate-meeting/

Unfortunately, this kind of opportunistic manipulation of scientific studies has become widespread in the past two decades.

https://www.science.org/content/arti...-death-penalty

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4699806/

You may hear talk of the "great reset" and associated conspiracy theories...

https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/what-is-the-great-reset/

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/our...t-great-reset/

Many conservatives see government responses to the pandemic and climate change as part of this movement. There is compelling evidence that many of the studies are greatly flawed.

The most compelling evidence is that none of the "studies" agree with each other, particularly regarding climate mechanisms. Rather than work out the issues and anomalies, and get to the scientific factual truth, the "scientists" at the regular world meetings simply agree to disagree, average the impact predictions of their studies and move on in their individual directions.

This in itself is the evidence that their studies are, in essence, junk science. When other scientists cannot reproduce the results based on evidence presented by another scientist it simply is not based on fact.